Literature DB >> 17907023

The positive predictive value of paramedic versus emergency physician interpretation of the prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram.

Daniel P Davis1, Cheryl Graydon, Robert Stein, Siobhan Wilson, Barbara Buesch, Shelley Berthiaume, David M Lee, Jaime Rivas, Gary M Vilke, Dennis R Leahy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obtaining a prehospital 12-lead ECG may improve triage and expedite care of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Whether the ECG should undergo physician review prior to activation of a percutaneous intervention (PCI) team is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To document the positive predictive value (PPV) of the prehospital 12-lead ECG when interpreted by paramedics versus emergency physicians.
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study. In November 2003, our local health care and emergency medical services (EMS) systems implemented a prehospital "cardiac alert" program in which patients suspected of having ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on the prehospital 12-lead ECG were diverted away from receiving facilities without emergent PCI capability and the PCI team was mobilized. For the first year, a cardiac alert was activated by paramedics (Phase I). After the first year, the ECG was transmitted to the ED, with the emergency physician (EP) responsible for activation (Phase II). The PPV for cardiac alerts in Phases I and II were compared by using three different "gold standards": cardiologist interpretation of the prehospital 12-lead ECG, disposition to emergent PCI, and coronary lesions on angiography or arrest prior to emergent PCI.
RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were enrolled (54 in Phase I, 56 in Phase II). Cardiologist confirmation of a STEMI on the prehospital 12-lead EKG was 42/54 (78%) in Phase I and 54/56 (96%) in Phase II. Disposition to emergent PCI occurred in 38/54 (70%) Phase I patients and 51/56 (91%) Phase II patients. Lesions at catheterization or arrest prior to emergent PCI were observed in 41/54 (69%) of Phase I patients and 50/56 (89%) of Phase II patients. All of these comparisons achieved statistical significance (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Transmission to the ED for EP interpretation improves the PPV of the prehospital 12-lead ECG for triage and therapeutic decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17907023     DOI: 10.1080/10903120701536784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  8 in total

1.  Emergency medical service predictive instrument-aided diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the IMMEDIATE trial.

Authors:  Harry P Selker; Joni R Beshansky; Robin Ruthazer; Patricia R Sheehan; Assaad J Sayah; James M Atkins; Tom P Aufderheide; Ronald G Pirrallo; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joseph M Massaro; John L Griffith
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Effects of Prehospital Traige and Diagnosis of ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Mortality Rate.

Authors:  Reza Alizadeh; Ziba Aghsaeifard; Mostafa Sadeghi; Parisa Hassani; Peyman Saberian
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2020-09-04

3.  Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3-year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis-to-balloon-time and care subintervals.

Authors:  Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Olayemi O Olubowale; Cathy A Jenkins; Karen F Miller; Jennifer L West; Timothy J Vogus; Christoph U Lehmann; Victoria D Antonello; Gordon R Bernard; Alan B Storrow; Christopher J Lindsell; Dandan Liu
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-02-17

4.  Emergency activations for chest pain and ventricular arrhythmias related to regional COVID-19 across the US.

Authors:  Sidney Aung; Eric Vittinghoff; Gregory Nah; Anthony Lin; Sean Joyce; N Clay Mann; Gregory M Marcus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy to Identify ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Interpretations of Prehospital Electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Akihito Tanaka; Kunihiro Matsuo; Migaku Kikuchi; Sunao Kojima; Hiroyuki Hanada; Toshiaki Mano; Takahiro Nakashima; Katsutaka Hashiba; Takeshi Yamamoto; Junichi Yamaguchi; Naoki Nakayama; Osamu Nomura; Tetsuya Matoba; Yoshio Tahara; Hiroshi Nonogi
Journal:  Circ Rep       Date:  2022-05-25

6.  Utility of prehospital electrocardiogram interpretation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction utilizing computer interpretation and transmission for interventional cardiologist consultation.

Authors:  Amir Faour; Callum Cherrett; Oliver Gibbs; Karen Lintern; Christian J Mussap; Rohan Rajaratnam; Dominic Y Leung; David A Taylor; Steve C Faddy; Sidney Lo; Craig P Juergens; John K French
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.585

7.  Factors associated with false-positive emergency medical services triage for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Pamela Yamamoto Swan; Beverly Nighswonger; Gregory L Boswell; Samuel J Stratton
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11

8.  Physician accuracy in interpreting potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction electrocardiograms.

Authors:  James M McCabe; Ehrin J Armstrong; Ivy Ku; Ameya Kulkarni; Kurt S Hoffmayer; Prashant D Bhave; Stephen W Waldo; Priscilla Hsue; John C Stein; Gregory M Marcus; Scott Kinlay; Peter Ganz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.