Literature DB >> 17906581

Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey.

Haymo W Thiel1, Jennifer E Bolton, Sharon Docherty, Jane C Portlock.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective national survey.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of serious and relatively minor adverse events following chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine by a sample of U.K. chiropractors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The risk of a serious adverse event following chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine is largely unknown. Estimates range from 1 in 200,000 to 1 in several million cervical spine manipulations.
METHODS: We studied treatment outcomes obtained from 19,722 patients. Manipulation was defined as the application of a high-velocity/low-amplitude or mechanically assisted thrust to the cervical spine. Serious adverse events, defined as "referred to hospital A&E and/or severe onset/worsening of symptoms immediately after treatment and/or resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity," and minor adverse events reported by patients as a worsening of presenting symptoms or onset of new symptoms, were recorded immediately, and up to 7 days, after treatment.
RESULTS: Data were obtained from 28,807 treatment consultations and 50,276 cervical spine manipulations. There were no reports of serious adverse events. This translates to an estimated risk of a serious adverse event of, at worse approximately 1 per 10,000 treatment consultations immediately after cervical spine manipulation, approximately 2 per 10,000 treatment consultations up to 7 days after treatment and approximately 6 per 100,000 cervical spine manipulations. Minor side effects with a possible neurologic involvement were more common. The highest risk immediately after treatment was fainting/dizziness/light-headedness in, at worse approximately 16 per 1000 treatment consultations. Up to 7 days after treatment, these risks were headache in, at worse approximately 4 per 100, numbness/tingling in upper limbs in, at worse approximately 15 per 1000 and fainting/dizziness/light-headedness in, at worse approximately 13 per 1000 treatment consultations.
CONCLUSION: Although minor side effects following cervical spine manipulation were relatively common, the risk of a serious adverse event, immediately or up to 7 days after treatment, was low to very low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17906581     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557bb1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  33 in total

1.  Manipulative practice in the cervical spine: a survey of IFOMPT member countries.

Authors:  Lisa Carlesso; Darren Rivett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

2.  Possible adverse events in children treated by manual therapy: a review.

Authors:  B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-06-02

3.  Safety of thrust joint manipulation in the thoracic spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emilio J Puentedura; William H O'Grady
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

4.  Is there a role for neck manipulation in elderly falls prevention? - An overview.

Authors:  Julie C Kendall; Jan Hartvigsen; Simon D French; Michael F Azari
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-03

5.  Determining adverse events in patients with neck pain receiving orthopaedic manual physiotherapy: a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  Lisa C Carlesso; Joy C Macdermid; P Lina Santaguida; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Craniocervical chiropractic procedures - a précis of upper cervical chiropractic.

Authors:  H Charles Woodfield; Craig York; Roderic P Rochester; Scott Bales; Mychal Beebe; Bryan Salminen; Jeffrey N Scholten
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-06

7.  Safety of cervical spine manipulation: are adverse events preventable and are manipulations being performed appropriately? A review of 134 case reports.

Authors:  Emilio J Puentedura; Jessica March; Joe Anders; Amber Perez; Merrill R Landers; Harvey W Wallmann; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

8.  In response to: Cook C. How about a little love for non-thrust manipulation?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

9.  Risk of traumatic injury associated with chiropractic spinal manipulation in Medicare Part B beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years.

Authors:  James M Whedon; Todd A Mackenzie; Reed B Phillips; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Relative effectiveness and adverse effects of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain: results from a stopped randomised trial.

Authors:  Hugh Gemmell; Peter Miller
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.