Literature DB >> 17905848

M-TASSER: an algorithm for protein quaternary structure prediction.

Huiling Chen1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

In a cell, it has been estimated that each protein on average interacts with roughly 10 others, resulting in tens of thousands of proteins known or suspected to have interaction partners; of these, only a tiny fraction have solved protein structures. To partially address this problem, we have developed M-TASSER, a hierarchical method to predict protein quaternary structure from sequence that involves template identification by multimeric threading, followed by multimer model assembly and refinement. The final models are selected by structure clustering. M-TASSER has been tested on a benchmark set comprising 241 dimers having templates with weak sequence similarity and 246 without multimeric templates in the dimer library. Of the total of 207 targets predicted to interact as dimers, 165 (80%) were correctly assigned as interacting with a true positive rate of 68% and a false positive rate of 17%. The initial best template structures have an average root mean-square deviation to native of 5.3, 6.7, and 7.4 A for the monomer, interface, and dimer structures. The final model shows on average a root mean-square deviation improvement of 1.3, 1.3, and 1.5 A over the initial template structure for the monomer, interface, and dimer structures, with refinement evident for 87% of the cases. Thus, we have developed a promising approach to predict full-length quaternary structure for proteins that have weak sequence similarity to proteins of solved quaternary structure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17905848      PMCID: PMC2186260          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  50 in total

1.  Networking proteins in yeast.

Authors:  T R Hazbun; S Fields
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein complexes take the bait.

Authors:  Anuj Kumar; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes.

Authors:  G Apic; J Gough; S A Teichmann
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Christian von Mering; Roland Krause; Berend Snel; Michael Cornell; Stephen G Oliver; Stanley Fields; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Daisuke Kihara; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-08-01

7.  The society of proteins.

Authors:  Alison Abbott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes.

Authors:  Aled M Edwards; Bart Kus; Ronald Jansen; Dov Greenbaum; Jack Greenblatt; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  J C Rain; L Selig; H De Reuse; V Battaglia; C Reverdy; S Simon; G Lenzen; F Petel; J Wojcik; V Schächter; Y Chemama; A Labigne; P Legrain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome.

Authors:  T Ito; T Chiba; R Ozawa; M Yoshida; M Hattori; Y Sakaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  24 in total

1.  The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  iAlign: a method for the structural comparison of protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Structural space of protein-protein interfaces is degenerate, close to complete, and highly connected.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Are protein-protein interfaces special regions on a protein's surface?

Authors:  Sam Tonddast-Navaei; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Howook Hwang; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  On the analysis of protein-protein interactions via knowledge-based potentials for the prediction of protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Elisenda Feliu; Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  New benchmark metrics for protein-protein docking methods.

Authors:  Mu Gao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-03-01

9.  Integrating ab initio and template-based algorithms for protein-protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Sweta Vangaveti; Thom Vreven; Yang Zhang; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Optimal mutation sites for PRE data collection and membrane protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Huiling Chen; Fei Ji; Victor Olman; Charles K Mobley; Yizhou Liu; Yunpeng Zhou; John H Bushweller; James H Prestegard; Ying Xu
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.