Literature DB >> 17905809

Measuring the impact of major life events upon happiness.

Dimitris Ballas1, Danny Dorling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years there have been numerous attempts to define and measure happiness in various contexts and pertaining to a wide range of disciplines, ranging from neuroscience and psychology to philosophy, economics and social policy. This article builds on recent work by economists who attempt to estimate happiness regressions using large random samples of individuals in order to calculate monetary 'compensating amounts' for different life 'events'.
METHODS: We estimate happiness regressions using the 'major life event' and 'happiness' data from the British Household Panel Survey.
RESULTS: The data and methods used in this article suggest that in contrast to living states such as 'being married', it is more events such as 'starting a new relationship' that have the highest positive effect on happiness. This is closely followed by 'employment-related gains' (in contrast to employment status). Also, women who become pregnant on average report higher than average levels of subjective happiness (in contrast to 'being a parent'). Other events that appear to be associated with happiness according to our analysis include 'personal education-related events' (e.g. starting a new course, graduating from University, passing exams) and 'finance/house related events' (e.g. buying a new house). On the other hand, the event that has the highest negative impact upon happiness according to our analysis is 'the end of my relationship' closely followed by 'death of a parent'. Adverse health events pertaining to the parents of the respondents also have a high negative coefficient and so does an employment-related loss.
CONCLUSION: The analysis presented in this article suggests that what matters the most in people's lives in Britain is to have good dynamic interpersonal relationships and to be respected at work with that respect being constantly renewed. These 'goods' are as much reflected through dynamic events as static situations. Relationships at work appear to be of a similar order of importance to those at home. Other factors that contribute to higher than average levels of subjective happiness, at least at a superficial level, include delaying death and keeping illness at bay, having babies, buying homes and cars and passing exams. The analysis presented here also suggests that people should not expect too much from their holidays and wider families. The findings presented in this article may help us to understand a little better the propensity for groups to be more or less happy and may help us to begin to better understand the importance of the dynamics of social context-the context in which we come to terms with reward and loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17905809     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  10 in total

1.  The relationship between negative life events, psychological distress and life satisfaction: a population-based study.

Authors:  Gunnvor Marum; Jocelyne Clench-Aas; Ragnhild B Nes; Ruth Kjærsti Raanaas
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Life events and sexual risk among HIV-negative, heterosexual, methamphetamine users.

Authors:  Shirley J Semple; Steffanie A Strathdee; Jim Zians; Thomas L Patterson
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2010-07

3.  The relative contributions of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health, and social relationships to life satisfaction in the United States.

Authors:  Steven D Barger; Carrie J Donoho; Heidi A Wayment
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The influence of regional deprivation index on personal happiness using multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Kil Hun Kim; Jin-Ho Chun; Hae Sook Sohn
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2015-04-16

5.  The gender gap in relation to happiness and preferences in married couples after childbirth: evidence from a field experiment in rural Ghana.

Authors:  Yusuke Kamiya; Bright Akpalu; Emmanuel Mahama; Emmanuel Kwesi Ayipah; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Abraham Hodgson; Akira Shibanuma; Kimiyo Kikuchi; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  The impact of exogenous shocks on national wellbeing. New Zealanders' reaction to COVID-19.

Authors:  Philip S Morrison; Stephanié Rossouw; Talita Greyling
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2021-10-06

7.  Deaths and major biographical events: a study of all cancer deaths in Germany from 1995 to 2009.

Authors:  Daniel Medenwald; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Parental divorce in childhood does not independently predict maternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy.

Authors:  Elviira Porthan; Matti Lindberg; Eeva Ekholm; Noora M Scheinin; Linnea Karlsson; Hasse Karlsson; Juho Härkönen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Parents of Children with Developmental Difficulties and Parents of Typically Developed Children: What Happens in a Year?

Authors:  Lana Lučić
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-18

10.  Do immigrants who stutter confront speech related anxiety in a foreign country?

Authors:  Abdulaziz Almudhi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.219

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.