BACKGROUND: The preferential use of primary iliac stenting vs selective stenting is controversial. This study compares the early and late clinical outcomes of primary vs selective iliac stenting at our institution. METHODS: A total of 110 consecutive patients with iliac stenosis (149 lesions) underwent primary stenting over a recent 5-year period (primary stent group). The early technical and clinical success and late clinical outcomes were compared with 41 patients (41 iliac lesions) who had percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) followed by selective stenting for suboptimal PTA (selective stent group). All patients were evaluated clinically and by duplex scanning with ankle-brachial indexes at 1, 6, and 12 months and every 12 months thereafter. RESULTS: The perioperative complication rate for the primary stent group was 2.7% (three minor hematomas) vs 24% for the selective stent group (P < .0001). The overall early clinical success rate was 97% for the primary stent group vs 83% for the selective stent group (P = .002), however, the rate was 100% for short stenosis (A and B lesions <5 cm TASC classification) in both groups; in contrast to 93% for the primary stent group vs 46% for the selective stent group for longer stenoses (TASC - C and D lesions, P = .0003). The overall late clinical success was comparable for both groups: 88% for the primary stent group vs 80% for the selective stent group, however, this rate was superior for the longer lesions in the primary stent group, 84% vs 46% (P = .007). The primary patency rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98%, 94%, 87%, and 77% for the primary stent group vs 83%, 78%, 69%, and 69% for the selective stent group (P = .030). These rates were comparable in both groups for shorter lesions: 100%, 98%, 98%, and 87% for the primary stent group vs 100%, 93%, 85%, and 85% for the selective stent group (P = .637). However, they were superior for the primary stent group in longer lesions: 96%, 90%, and 72% vs 46%, 46%, and 28% for the selective stent group at 1, 2, and 3 years (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall early clinical success rate was superior for the primary stent group. However, the initial (early) and late clinical success rates were comparable for short lesions (TASC - A and B lesions), but were inferior in selective stenting for longer lesions (TASC - C and D). Therefore, primary stenting should be offered to all TASC - C and D lesions.
BACKGROUND: The preferential use of primary iliac stenting vs selective stenting is controversial. This study compares the early and late clinical outcomes of primary vs selective iliac stenting at our institution. METHODS: A total of 110 consecutive patients with iliac stenosis (149 lesions) underwent primary stenting over a recent 5-year period (primary stent group). The early technical and clinical success and late clinical outcomes were compared with 41 patients (41 iliac lesions) who had percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) followed by selective stenting for suboptimal PTA (selective stent group). All patients were evaluated clinically and by duplex scanning with ankle-brachial indexes at 1, 6, and 12 months and every 12 months thereafter. RESULTS: The perioperative complication rate for the primary stent group was 2.7% (three minor hematomas) vs 24% for the selective stent group (P < .0001). The overall early clinical success rate was 97% for the primary stent group vs 83% for the selective stent group (P = .002), however, the rate was 100% for short stenosis (A and B lesions <5 cm TASC classification) in both groups; in contrast to 93% for the primary stent group vs 46% for the selective stent group for longer stenoses (TASC - C and D lesions, P = .0003). The overall late clinical success was comparable for both groups: 88% for the primary stent group vs 80% for the selective stent group, however, this rate was superior for the longer lesions in the primary stent group, 84% vs 46% (P = .007). The primary patency rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98%, 94%, 87%, and 77% for the primary stent group vs 83%, 78%, 69%, and 69% for the selective stent group (P = .030). These rates were comparable in both groups for shorter lesions: 100%, 98%, 98%, and 87% for the primary stent group vs 100%, 93%, 85%, and 85% for the selective stent group (P = .637). However, they were superior for the primary stent group in longer lesions: 96%, 90%, and 72% vs 46%, 46%, and 28% for the selective stent group at 1, 2, and 3 years (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall early clinical success rate was superior for the primary stent group. However, the initial (early) and late clinical success rates were comparable for short lesions (TASC - A and B lesions), but were inferior in selective stenting for longer lesions (TASC - C and D). Therefore, primary stenting should be offered to all TASC - C and D lesions.
Authors: George S Georgiadis; Efstratios I Georgakarakos; Nikolaos Schoretsanitis; Christos C Argyriou; George A Antoniou; Miltos K Lazarides Journal: Case Rep Vasc Med Date: 2015-12-09