BACKGROUND: We studied the characteristics of family functioning in bipolar children and healthy comparison children. We hypothesized that the family environment of bipolar children would show greater levels of dysfunction as measured by the Family Environment Scale (FES). METHODS: We compared the family functioning of 36 families that included a child with DSM-IV bipolar disorder versus 29 comparison families that included only healthy children. All subjects and their parents were assessed with the K-SADS-PL interview. The parents completed the FES to assess their current family functioning. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare the family environment of families with and without offspring with bipolar disorder. RESULTS: Parents of bipolar children reported lower levels of family cohesion (p<0.001), expressiveness (p=0.005), active-recreational orientation (p<0.001), intellectual-cultural orientation (p=0.04) and higher levels of conflict (p<0.001) compared to parents with no bipolar children. Secondary analyses within the bipolar group revealed lower levels of organization (p=0.031) and cohesion (p=0.014) in families where a parent had a history of mood disorders compared to families where parents had no history of mood disorders. Length of illness in the affected child was inversely associated with family cohesion (r=-0.47, p=0.004). LIMITATIONS: Due to the case-control design of the study, we cannot comment on the development of these family problems or attribute their cause specifically to child bipolar disorder. CONCLUSION: Families with bipolar children show dysfunctional patterns related to interpersonal interactions and personal growth. A distressed family environment should be addressed when treating children with bipolar disorder.
BACKGROUND: We studied the characteristics of family functioning in bipolar children and healthy comparison children. We hypothesized that the family environment of bipolar children would show greater levels of dysfunction as measured by the Family Environment Scale (FES). METHODS: We compared the family functioning of 36 families that included a child with DSM-IV bipolar disorder versus 29 comparison families that included only healthy children. All subjects and their parents were assessed with the K-SADS-PL interview. The parents completed the FES to assess their current family functioning. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare the family environment of families with and without offspring with bipolar disorder. RESULTS: Parents of bipolar children reported lower levels of family cohesion (p<0.001), expressiveness (p=0.005), active-recreational orientation (p<0.001), intellectual-cultural orientation (p=0.04) and higher levels of conflict (p<0.001) compared to parents with no bipolar children. Secondary analyses within the bipolar group revealed lower levels of organization (p=0.031) and cohesion (p=0.014) in families where a parent had a history of mood disorders compared to families where parents had no history of mood disorders. Length of illness in the affected child was inversely associated with family cohesion (r=-0.47, p=0.004). LIMITATIONS: Due to the case-control design of the study, we cannot comment on the development of these family problems or attribute their cause specifically to childbipolar disorder. CONCLUSION: Families with bipolar children show dysfunctional patterns related to interpersonal interactions and personal growth. A distressed family environment should be addressed when treating children with bipolar disorder.
Authors: Rebecca S Siegel; Bettina Hoeppner; Shirley Yen; Robert L Stout; Lauren M Weinstock; Heather M Hower; Boris Birmaher; Tina R Goldstein; Benjamin I Goldstein; Jeffrey I Hunt; Michael Strober; David A Axelson; Mary Kay Gill; Martin B Keller Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Matthew E Young; Thania Galvan; Brooke L Reidy; Matthew F Pescosolido; Kerri L Kim; Karen Seymour; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Heather A MacPherson; Amanda L Ruggieri; Rachel E Christensen; Elana Schettini; Kerri L Kim; Sarah A Thomas; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Lisa A Pan; Tina R Goldstein; Brian T Rooks; Mary Hickey; Jie Yu Fan; John Merranko; Kelly Monk; Rasim S Diler; Dara J Sakolsky; Danella Hafeman; Satish Iyengar; Benjamin Goldstein; David J Kupfer; David A Axelson; David A Brent; Boris Birmaher Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Guillermo Perez Algorta; Heather A MacPherson; Eric A Youngstrom; Caroline C Belt; L Eugene Arnold; Thomas W Frazier; H Gerry Taylor; Boris Birmaher; Sarah McCue Horwitz; Robert L Findling; Mary A Fristad Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2017-02-26
Authors: Soledad Romero; Boris Birmaher; David A Axelson; Ana-Maria Iosif; Douglas E Williamson; Mary Kay Gill; Benjamin I Goldstein; Michael A Strober; Jeffrey Hunt; Tina R Goldstein; Christianne Esposito-Smythers; Satish Iyengar; Neal D Ryan; Martin Keller Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Manpreet K Singh; Kiki D Chang; Ryan G Kelley; Manish Saggar; Allan L Reiss; Ian H Gotlib Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 6.744