Literature DB >> 17905118

Minimally invasive approach for treatment of urinary and fecal incontinence in selected patients with spina bifida.

Armando J Lorenzo1, Peter G Chait, M Chad Wallis, Anthony Raikhlin, Walid A Farhat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: At our institution, the use of cecostomy tubes has provided a successful method for managing severe constipation in patients with spina bifida, with good patient and caretaker satisfaction and minimal morbidity. We have developed a modified technique to allow placement of the cecostomy tube under direct vision during laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy. We present our initial experience and technique.
METHODS: Patients with a normal bladder capacity and compliance who were scheduled for creation of an appendicovesicostomy and who also had refractory constipation were offered concurrent cecostomy tube placement. At the laparoscopic procedure, we performed percutaneous placement of the cecostomy tube through the abdominal wall under direct visualization. Subsequently, dissection of the appendix with its mesentery was performed. The detrusor muscle was dissected and a trough for the appendix created. Laparoscopic anastomosis of the appendix to the bladder mucosa and approximation of the detrusor over the appendix created a nonrefluxing channel.
RESULTS: Three patients have undergone concurrent cecostomy tube placement at appendicovesicostomy. No complications have been encountered thus far. On follow-up, the cecostomy tube scar has been well concealed and appears no different from the ones placed under radiologic guidance. The patients have been using the catheterizable channel to access the bladder and dry performing intermittent catheterization without difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a neurogenic bladder who do not qualify for major bladder reconstructive procedures, such as augmentation cystoplasty or bladder neck repair, social continence and independence can be achieved with minimally invasive surgery. Concomitant laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy and cecostomy tube placement may be a suitable surgical option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17905118     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bladder and bowel dysfunction in children: An update on the diagnosis and treatment of a common, but underdiagnosed pediatric problem.

Authors:  Joana Dos Santos; Roberto I Lopes; Martin A Koyle
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Current approaches to the urologic care of children with spina bifida.

Authors:  David B Joseph
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Laparoscopic cecostomy tube placement in an Indiana pouch.

Authors:  Scott E Delacroix; Richard Vanlangendonck; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy in a patient with spina bifida and ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Authors:  Ali Ghomi; Reza Askari; Seshadri Kasturi; Samadh F Ravangard
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Low-frequency electrotherapy for female patients with detrusor underactivity due to neuromuscular deficiency.

Authors:  Dan-Feng Xu; Shen Zhang; Cun-Zhou Wang; Jun Li; Chuang-Yu Qu; Xin-Gang Cui; Sheng-Jia Zhao
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient or Caregiver Regret following Surgery for Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Bhalaajee Meenakshi-Sundaram; Caitlin T Coco; James R Furr; Byron P Dubow; Christopher E Aston; Jennifer Lewis; Gennady Slobodov; Bradley P Kropp; Dominic C Frimberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.