Literature DB >> 17905106

Prostate-cancer-specific survival and clinical progression-free survival in men with prostate cancer treated intermittently with testosterone-inactivating pharmaceuticals.

Mark Scholz1, Richard Lam, Stephen Strum, Robert Jennrich, Henry Johnson, Tom Trilling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: More than 85% of men with prostate cancer die of other causes. An effective method is needed to distinguish fatal forms of prostate cancer from benign variants.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review from a medical oncology practice specializing in prostate cancer. All men with negative bone scans, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 100 ng/mL, adequate records for review, and who started taking testosterone inactivating pharmaceutical (TIP) agents before January 2000 were included in the study. Six factors were evaluated as potential predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality: PSA nadir greater than 0.05 ng/mL while taking TIP, PSA doubling time of less than 12 months, Gleason score, stage, baseline PSA level greater than 20 ng/mL, and age.
RESULTS: The study criteria were met by 160 men. The median follow-up was 10 years. The median age, PSA level, PSA nadir, and PSA doubling time was 65.6 years, 9.6 ng/mL, 0.03 ng/mL, and 10 months, respectively. Of the 160 men, 39 died of prostate cancer. Death from prostate cancer was far more common (78% versus 11%) and accelerated (median of 4 years versus 7 years) for men with a PSA nadir greater than 0.05 ng/mL than for those with a lower nadir. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the hazard ratio for prostate cancer-specific mortality in men with a PSA nadir greater than 0.05 ng/mL was 11.6 (P <0.0001). The hazard ratio for men with a PSA doubling time of less than 12 months was 2.9 (P = 0.04). Gleason score, stage, baseline PSA level greater than 20 ng/mL, and age were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the factors studied, the PSA nadir while taking a TIP was the best predictor of prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17905106     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Regulation of Nrf2- and AP-1-mediated gene expression by epigallocatechin-3-gallate and sulforaphane in prostate of Nrf2-knockout or C57BL/6J mice and PC-3 AP-1 human prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Sujit Nair; Avantika Barve; Tin-Oo Khor; Guo-xiang Shen; Wen Lin; Jefferson Y Chan; Li Cai; Ah-Ng Kong
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Personalizing Androgen Suppression for Prostate Cancer Using Mathematical Modeling.

Authors:  Yoshito Hirata; Kai Morino; Koichiro Akakura; Celestia S Higano; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas C Buchan; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Noncanonical Wnt signaling mediates androgen-dependent tumor growth in a mouse model of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sayuri Takahashi; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Maiko Okada; Kazuki Inoue; Takashi Ueda; Ichiro Takada; Tetsuro Watabe; Yoko Yamamoto; Toru Fukuda; Takashi Nakamura; Chihiro Akimoto; Tetsuya Fujimura; Maiko Hoshino; Yuuki Imai; Daniel Metzger; Kohei Miyazono; Yasuhiro Minami; Pierre Chambon; Tadaichi Kitamura; Takahiro Matsumoto; Shigeaki Kato
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Risk stratification in the hormonal treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew A Uhlman; Judd W Moul; Ping Tang; Danielle A Stackhouse; Leon Sun
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.168

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.