OBJECTIVE: The goal of the work described here was to develop and pilot a theoretically based self-management intervention in adults with epilepsy. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial examined intervention effectiveness of a 6-week psychosocial intervention designed to improve self-efficacy and quality of life for 61 adults with diagnosed epilepsy. Measures included the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-89 inventory (QOLIE-89), the Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory (WPSI), a locus of control scale (LOC), and the Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale-2000 (ESES). Group differences were examined between groups using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the QOLIE-89 Role Limitations-Emotional score in the treatment group at follow-up, but no significant differences in overall quality of life. Strong and significant correlations were observed between outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Although the intervention had little effect on improving overall quality of life, we observed promising trends in postintervention group comparisons linking self-efficacy and other psychosocial factors with quality of life. Intervention material can be modified for stage-based behavior change and retested in another study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the work described here was to develop and pilot a theoretically based self-management intervention in adults with epilepsy. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial examined intervention effectiveness of a 6-week psychosocial intervention designed to improve self-efficacy and quality of life for 61 adults with diagnosed epilepsy. Measures included the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-89 inventory (QOLIE-89), the Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory (WPSI), a locus of control scale (LOC), and the Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale-2000 (ESES). Group differences were examined between groups using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the QOLIE-89 Role Limitations-Emotional score in the treatment group at follow-up, but no significant differences in overall quality of life. Strong and significant correlations were observed between outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Although the intervention had little effect on improving overall quality of life, we observed promising trends in postintervention group comparisons linking self-efficacy and other psychosocial factors with quality of life. Intervention material can be modified for stage-based behavior change and retested in another study.
Authors: Rosa Michaelis; Venus Tang; Sarah J Nevitt; Janelle L Wagner; Avani C Modi; William Curt LaFrance; Laura H Goldstein; Milena Gandy; Rebecca Bresnahan; Kette Valente; Kirsten A Donald; Markus Reuber Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-09-07
Authors: Rosa Michaelis; Venus Tang; Janelle L Wagner; Avani C Modi; William Curt LaFrance; Laura H Goldstein; Tobias Lundgren; Markus Reuber Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-10-27
Authors: Loes Am Leenen; Ben Fm Wijnen; Reina Ja de Kinderen; Marian Hjm Majoie; Caroline M van Heugten; Silvia Maa Evers Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Hoi Yau Chan; Loes Am Leenen; Ben Fm Wijnen; Ingeborg M van der Putten; Silvia Maa Evers; Marian Hjm Majoie; Caroline M van Heugten Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 3.477