David R Boyd1, Stephen J Genuis. 1. School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6. drboyd@uvic.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to environmental hazards contributes to many chronic diseases, yet the magnitude of their contribution to the total disease burden in Canada is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the environmental burden of disease (EBD) in Canada for respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and congenital affliction. Quantifying the contribution of environmental exposures to the overall burden of disease could play an important role in shaping public health and environmental policy priorities. METHODS: The World Health Organization (WHO) recently estimated the environmental burden of disease globally by using a combination of comparative risk assessment data and expert judgment to develop environmentally attributable fractions (EAFs) of mortality and morbidity for 85 categories of disease. We use the EAFs developed by the WHO, EAFs developed by other researchers, and data from Canadian public health institutions to provide an initial estimate of the environmental burden of disease in Canada for four major categories of disease. RESULTS: Our results indicate that: 10,000-25,000 deaths; 78,000-194,000 hospitalizations; 600,000-1.5 million days spent in hospital; 1.1 million-1.8 million restricted activity days for asthma sufferers; 8000-24,000 new cases of cancer; 500-2500 low birth weight babies; and between $3.6 billion and $9.1 billion in costs occur in Canada each year due to respiratory disease, cardiovascular illness, cancer, and congenital affliction associated with adverse environmental exposures. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness in Canada resulting from adverse environmental exposures is significant. Stronger efforts to prevent adverse environmental exposures are warranted, including research, education, and regulation.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to environmental hazards contributes to many chronic diseases, yet the magnitude of their contribution to the total disease burden in Canada is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the environmental burden of disease (EBD) in Canada for respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and congenital affliction. Quantifying the contribution of environmental exposures to the overall burden of disease could play an important role in shaping public health and environmental policy priorities. METHODS: The World Health Organization (WHO) recently estimated the environmental burden of disease globally by using a combination of comparative risk assessment data and expert judgment to develop environmentally attributable fractions (EAFs) of mortality and morbidity for 85 categories of disease. We use the EAFs developed by the WHO, EAFs developed by other researchers, and data from Canadian public health institutions to provide an initial estimate of the environmental burden of disease in Canada for four major categories of disease. RESULTS: Our results indicate that: 10,000-25,000 deaths; 78,000-194,000 hospitalizations; 600,000-1.5 million days spent in hospital; 1.1 million-1.8 million restricted activity days for asthma sufferers; 8000-24,000 new cases of cancer; 500-2500 low birth weight babies; and between $3.6 billion and $9.1 billion in costs occur in Canada each year due to respiratory disease, cardiovascular illness, cancer, and congenital affliction associated with adverse environmental exposures. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness in Canada resulting from adverse environmental exposures is significant. Stronger efforts to prevent adverse environmental exposures are warranted, including research, education, and regulation.
Authors: Susan Lavinia Greco; Elaina MacIntyre; Stephanie Young; Hunter Warden; Christopher Drudge; JinHee Kim; Elisa Candido; Paul Demers; Ray Copes Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Markey Johnson; Hwashin Hyun Shin; Eric Roberts; Liu Sun; Mandy Fisher; Perry Hystad; Aaron Van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; William D Fraser; Eric Lavigne; Nina Clark; Vanessa Beaulac; Tye E Arbuckle Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Premkumari Kumarathasan; Gabriela Williams; Agnieszka Bielecki; Erica Blais; Denise G Hemmings; Graeme Smith; Peter von Dadelszen; Mandy Fisher; Tye E Arbuckle; William D Fraser; Renaud Vincent Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 3.240