Literature DB >> 17904462

Prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis: a meta-analysis.

Angelia Kirkpatrick1, Suman Rathbun, Thomas Whitsett, Gary Raskob.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients with central venous catheters is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients with central venous catheters.
METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to May 2006, supplemented by manual searches of conference proceedings and bibliographies.
RESULTS: Fifteen trials were included. Unfractionated heparin infusion, oral fixed low-dose vitamin K antagonist, and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin were evaluated. For all catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis (symptomatic and asymptomatic combined), the summary relative risks ranged from 0.31 to 0.73 (all achieved statistical significance). For symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, the summary relative risks ranged from 0.28 to 0.72, but did not achieve statistical significance for any individual regimen.
CONCLUSION: Anticoagulant prophylaxis is effective for preventing all catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis in patients with central venous catheters. The effectiveness for preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism, remains uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904462     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  9 in total

1.  The clinical significance of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Fletcher; William Stetler; Thomas J Wilson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Central venous catheter-related thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Vidal; A Sharathkumar; J Glover; E V S Faustino
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 3.  Primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical and surgical oncology patients.

Authors:  A Stanley; A Young
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Comparison of heparinized saline and 0.9% sodium chloride for maintaining central venous catheter patency in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Julieann Vose; Adesola Odunayo; Joshua M Price; Maggie Daves; Julie C Schildt; M Katherine Tolbert
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Preoperative prediction of the need for arterial and central venous catheterization using machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Jungyo Suh; Sang-Wook Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anju Puri; Haiyun Dai; Mohan Giri; Chengfei Wu; Huanhuan Huang; Qinghua Zhao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Jugular venous catheter-associated thrombosis and fatal pulmonary embolism: A case report.

Authors:  Jinrong Wang; Lili Wang; Huimian Shang; Xiaoya Yang; Shufen Guo; Yanling Wang; Chaobo Cui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Anticoagulation in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Arun Jose; Mark H Eckman; Jean M Elwing
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.017

9.  Early prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related thrombosis using 1% chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tomoko Yamashita; Ayako Takamori; Akira Nakagawachi; Yoshinori Tanigawa; Yohei Hamada; Yosuke Aoki; Yoshiro Sakaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.