Literature DB >> 17904289

Fear of pain and defensive activation.

Margaret M Bradley1, Tammy Silakowski, Peter J Lang.   

Abstract

Fear of pain and its relationship to dental fear was investigated by measuring autonomic reactions (skin conductance and heart rate) in individuals reporting high and low dental fear when in the presence of a cue that threatened the presentation of electric shock ("threat") or not ("safe"). Acoustic startle probes were also presented during both threat and safe periods, and the reflexive eye blink, the skin conductance response, and cardiac changes to the startle probe measured. All participants reacted with greater defensive reactivity, including potentiated startle blinks, heightened skin conductance, and cardiac deceleration in the context of threat, compared to safe, cues. Individuals reporting high dental fear were significantly more reactive during threat periods, compared to low fear individuals, showing larger blink reflexes and heightened electrodermal activity, as well as heightened autonomic responses to the startle probe itself. Individual differences in defensive reactivity persisted even after participants received a single mild shock halfway through the experiment. The data indicate that threat of shock elicits heightened defensive reactivity in those reporting high dental fear, consistent with the hypothesis that fear of potentially painful events may be a potent mediator of the anxiety involved in anticipated medical and dental treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904289      PMCID: PMC2519040          DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  19 in total

1.  Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Automated Pain Assessment using Electrodermal Activity Data and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Busra T Susam; Murat Akcakaya; Hooman Nezamfar; Damaris Diaz; Xiaojing Xu; Virginia R de Sa; Kenneth D Craig; Jeannie S Huang; Matthew S Goodwin
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2018-07

3.  Getting better with age: the relationship between age, acceptance, and negative affect.

Authors:  Amanda J Shallcross; Brett Q Ford; Victoria A Floerke; Iris B Mauss
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-12-31

4.  Effects of inducible nitric oxide synthase blockade within the periaqueductal gray on cardiovascular responses during mechanical, heat, and cold nociception.

Authors:  Kevin A Chaitoff; Francis Toner; Anthony Tedesco; Timothy J Maher; Ahmmed Ally
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Neurocognitive profile of a man with Dandy-Walker malformation: Evidence of subtle cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome.

Authors:  Janna Belser-Ehrlich; Jacob Adrian Lafo; Paul Mangal; Margaret Bradley; Meredith Wicklund; Dawn Bowers
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  When fear forms memories: threat of shock and brain potentials during encoding and recognition.

Authors:  Mathias Weymar; Margaret M Bradley; Alfons O Hamm; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  The anxiety spectrum and the reflex physiology of defense: from circumscribed fear to broad distress.

Authors:  Lisa M McTeague; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  Startle reflex modulation during threat of shock and "threat" of reward.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Zvinka Z Zlatar; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Assessing the role of the amygdala in fear of pain: Neural activation under threat of shock.

Authors:  Nicola Sambuco; Vincent D Costa; Peter J Lang; Margaret M Bradley
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Encoding and reinstatement of threat: recognition potentials.

Authors:  Mathias Weymar; Margaret M Bradley; Alfons O Hamm; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.