Literature DB >> 17904236

Discrimination of time intervals presented in sequences: spatial effects with multiple auditory sources.

Simon Grondin1, Marilyn Plourde.   

Abstract

This article discusses two experiments on the discrimination of time intervals presented in sequences marked by brief auditory signals. Participants had to indicate whether the last interval in a series of three intervals marked by four auditory signals was shorter or longer than the previous intervals. Three base durations were under investigation: 75, 150, and 225 ms. In Experiment 1, sounds were presented through headphones, from a single-speaker in front of the participants or by four equally spaced speakers. In all three presentation modes, the highest different threshold was obtained in the lower base duration condition (75 ms), thus indicating an impairment of temporal processing when sounds are presented too rapidly. The results also indicate the presence, in each presentation mode, of a 'time-shrinking effect' (i.e., with the last interval being perceived as briefer than the preceding ones) at 75 ms, but not at 225 ms. Lastly, using different sound sources to mark time did not significantly impair discrimination. In Experiment 2, three signals were presented from the same source, and the last signal was presented at one of two locations, either close or far. The perceived duration was not influenced by the location of the fourth signal when the participant knew before each trial where the sounds would be delivered. However, when the participant was uncertain as to its location, more space between markers resulted in longer perceived duration, a finding that applies only at 150 and 225 ms. Moreover, the perceived duration was affected by the direction of the sequences (left-right vs. right-left).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904236     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  7 in total

1.  Examining auditory kappa effects through manipulating intensity differences between sequential tones.

Authors:  Doug Alards-Tomalin; Launa C Leboe-McGowan; Todd A Mondor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-27

2.  Discrimination is not impaired when more cortical space between two electro-tactile markers increases perceived duration.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kuroda; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Exploring the reciprocal modulation of time and space in dancers and non-dancers.

Authors:  Barbara Magnani; Massimiliano Oliveri; Francesca Frassinetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  On the interplay of visuospatial and audiotemporal dominance: Evidence from a multimodal kappa effect.

Authors:  Karin M Bausenhart; Katrina R Quinn
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Malleability of time through progress bars and throbbers.

Authors:  Mounia Ziat; Wafa Saoud; Sonja Prychitko; Philip Servos; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Auditory time-interval perception as causal inference on sound sources.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Sawai; Yoshiyuki Sato; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-28

7.  Word Distance Affects Subjective Temporal Distance.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yu Liu; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.