Literature DB >> 17904201

Comparison of storm intensity and application timing on modeled transport and fate of six contaminants.

Erica D Chiovarou1, Thomas C Siewicki.   

Abstract

Hundreds, if not thousands, of fish kills and kills of other aquatic organisms occur following storms in the US each year, but they are difficult to quantify, investigate, or manage due to the transient nature of major storms and the other priorities following them. Methods are needed to better understand the causes of these kills. The Pesticide Root Zone Model and the Exposure Analysis Modeling System were used to compare risk to resident biota in estuarine headwaters in two locations under various conditions. Contaminants were selected using a landuse-based preliminary risk assessment approach. Atrazine, fipronil, and imidacloprid were compared for potential impacts on important prey species, including copepods and grass shrimp, in Lake Bethel in Volusia County, Florida. Carbaryl, diquat dibromide, and fluoranthene were compared for potential impacts on salmon and other aquatic species in Johnson Creek, near Portland, Oregon. Predictions of contaminant concentrations in groundwater runoff, surface water, benthic sediments, and pelagic biota tissue were obtained based upon watershed characteristics, storm types, and contaminant chemistry and application. For all six contaminants, the simulated concentrations were highest following the 100-yr storms and lowest following the 2-yr storms. Aqueous concentrations ranged between 84 and 2100% higher in 100-yr compared to two-yr storms. Most atrazine and carbaryl concentrations were highest if applied one day before the storm while fipronil, imidacloprid, and diquat dibromide were highest if applied 16 days prior to the storm. Carbaryl and fluoranthene concentrations were highest in the forested segment of the watershed while diquat dibromide concentrations were highest in the agricultural segment. In Florida simulations, groundwater and surface water concentrations generally were highest for atrazine, followed by imidacloprid, and then fipronil. Atrazine poses the highest risk to algae and copepods due to its mobility and high allowable application rates. Fipronil and imidacloprid, though highly toxic, were not predicted to occur at high enough concentrations to pose a risk. In Oregon simulations, groundwater and surface water concentrations generally were highest for carbaryl, followed by fluoranthene, and then diquat dibromide. For salmonids, fluoranthene poses a higher risk than carbaryl, whereas it is unlikely that diquat dibromide will affect salmonids in this system. For crustaceans, carbaryl poses the greatest risk, followed by fluoranthene. Diquat dibromide was determined to pose little risk. These tests demonstrate the use of preliminary risk assessment, along with transport and fate modeling, to characterize risks to aquatic organisms without the need for in situ chemical measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904201     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Two-dimensional high performance liquid chromatography separation and tandem mass spectrometry detection of atrazine and its metabolic and hydrolysis products in urine.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik; Parinya Panuwet; Nayana K Jayatilaka; James L Pirkle; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Spatiotemporal sensitivity analysis of vertical transport of pesticides in soil.

Authors:  Tao Hong; S Thomas Purucker
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 5.288

Review 3.  Impacts of Neonicotinoids on Molluscs: What We Know and What We Need to Know.

Authors:  Endurance E Ewere; Amanda Reichelt-Brushett; Kirsten Benkendorff
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-01-22

4.  Environmental fate of soil applied neonicotinoid insecticides in an irrigated potato agroecosystem.

Authors:  Anders S Huseth; Russell L Groves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.