Literature DB >> 17903417

Risk factors for Salmonella seroconversion of fattening pigs in farrow-to-finish herds.

Pierre-Alexandre Beloeil1, Claire Chauvin, Karine Proux, Christelle Fablet, François Madec, Ahmadou Alioum.   

Abstract

We did a prospective observational 9-month long study to quantify risk factors of managerial and hygiene practices, and pig-health status for Salmonella seroconversion of fattening pigs reared in subclinically infected French farrow-to-finish farms. During the fattening phase, 2,649 pigs belonging to the same batch of contemporary pigs, from 89 conventional farrow-to-finish farms were individually followed and regularly blood sampled on a monthly basis. Farm recruitment was based on the farmer's willingness to cooperate. Pig status was assessed using an indirect ELISA test. Evolution of the serological status was studied by means of survival analysis. A Cox proportional-hazards model, taking into account the clustering of animals at the farm level, was used to examine the effects of explanatory variables on the time to Salmonella seroconversion of pigs. Applying group level antibiotic treatment to the pigs during the fattening period (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.4) was identified as a risk factor for Salmonella seroconversion, as the presence of residual Salmonella contamination in the fattening pen before placing the pigs into the pens (HR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.9). Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) seropositivity during the fattening period also indicated an increased hazard for seroconversion (HR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.5). The batch size was identified as a risk factor for Salmonella seroconversion: the higher the number of pigs was in the fattening room followed, the higher was the risk (HR(+10 pigs) = 1.05 for a 10-pig increment; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.06). The biosecurity measures of wearing specific clothes before entering the facilities (HR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3, 0.9) and enclosing the pig farm facilities were protective (HR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17903417     DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2007034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  11 in total

1.  Direct and indirect transmission of four Salmonella enterica serotypes in pigs.

Authors:  Julia Osterberg; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin; Per Wallgren
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium lacking the ZnuABC transporter: an efficacious orally-administered mucosal vaccine against salmonellosis in pigs.

Authors:  Matteo Gradassi; Michele Pesciaroli; Nicola Martinelli; Jessica Ruggeri; Paola Petrucci; Walid Hamdy Hassan; Manuela Raffatellu; Frine Eleonora Scaglione; Serena Ammendola; Andrea Battistoni; Giovanni L Alborali; Paolo Pasquali
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Investigation of the Distribution of Salmonella within an Integrated Pig Breeding and Production Organisation in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A Wales; J Weaver; I M McLaren; R P Smith; D Mueller-Doblies; R H Davies
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2013-12-17

4.  Evaluation of an enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocol in Salmonella contaminated pig holdings in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Francesca Martelli; Mark Lambert; Paul Butt; Tanya Cheney; Fabrizio Antonio Tatone; Rebecca Callaby; André Rabie; Rebecca J Gosling; Steve Fordon; Graham Crocker; Robert H Davies; Richard Piers Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Surveillance Data Highlights Feed Form, Biosecurity, and Disease Control as Significant Factors Associated with Salmonella Infection on Farrow-to-Finish Pig Farms.

Authors:  Hector Argüello; Edgar G Manzanilla; Helen Lynch; Kavita Walia; Finola C Leonard; John Egan; Geraldine Duffy; Gillian E Gardiner; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Assessing risk profiles for Salmonella serotypes in breeding pig operations in Portugal using a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Authors:  Carla Correia-Gomes; Theodoros Economou; Denisa Mendonça; Madalena Vieira-Pinto; João Niza-Ribeiro
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  High levels of contamination and antimicrobial-resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars on pig and poultry farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.

Authors:  L T P Tu; N V M Hoang; N V Cuong; J Campbell; J E Bryant; N T Hoa; B T Kiet; C Thompson; D T Duy; V V Phat; V B Hien; G Thwaites; S Baker; J J Carrique-Mas
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 4.434

8.  Effects of Social Cues on Biosecurity Compliance in Livestock Facilities: Evidence From Experimental Simulations.

Authors:  Luke Trinity; Scott C Merrill; Eric M Clark; Christopher J Koliba; Asim Zia; Gabriela Bucini; Julia M Smith
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-03-27

9.  Longitudinal study describing time to Salmonella seroconversion in piglets on three farrow-to-finish farms.

Authors:  Maria Cevallos-Almeida; Christelle Fablet; Catherine Houdayer; Virginie Dorenlor; Florent Eono; Martine Denis; Annaëlle Kerouanton
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2019-10-05

10.  Salmonella contamination in a network of 10 pig farms interconnected within the same cooperative.

Authors:  Alexandra Henry; Ann Letellier; Jean-Charles Côté; Gabriel Desmarais; Virginie Lachapelle; Nadia Bergeron; Sylvette Lewandowsky; Philippe Fravalo
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2019-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.