Literature DB >> 17903227

Explaining differences in birthweight between ethnic populations. The Generation R Study.

E J W M Troe1, H Raat, V W V Jaddoe, A Hofman, C W N Looman, H A Moll, E A P Steegers, F C Verhulst, J C M Witteman, J P Mackenbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether differences in birthweight of various ethnic groups residing in The Netherlands can be explained by determinants of birthweight.
DESIGN: Population-based birth cohort study.
SETTING: Data of pregnant women and their partners in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. POPULATION: We examined data of 6044 pregnant women with a Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish, Capeverdean, Antillean, Surinamese-Creole, Surinamese-Hindustani and Surinamese-other ethnic background.
METHODS: Regression analyses were used to assess the impact of biomedical, socio-demographic and lifestyle-related determinants on birthweight differences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Birthweight was established immediately after delivery in grams.
RESULTS: Compared with mean birthweight of offspring of Dutch women (3485 g, SD 555), the mean birthweight was lower in all non-Dutch populations, except in Moroccans. Differences ranged from an 88-g lower birthweight in offspring of the Turkish women to a 424-g lower birthweight in offspring of Surinamese-Hindustani women. Differences in gestational age, maternal and paternal height largely explained the lower birthweight in the Turkish, Antillean, Surinamese-Creole and Surinamese-other populations. Differences in birthweight between the Dutch and the Capeverdean and Surinamese-Hindustani populations could only partly be explained by the studied determinants.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm significant differences in birthweight between ethnic populations that can only partly be understood from established determinants of birthweight. The part that is understood points to the importance of determinants that cannot easily be modified, such as parental height. Further study is necessary to obtain a fuller understanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17903227     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01508.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  30 in total

1.  Francophone and Anglophone perinatal health: temporal and regional inequalities in a Canadian setting, 1981-2008.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Alison L Park; Sam Harper
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Determinants of the intention of preconception care use: lessons from a multi-ethnic urban population in the Netherlands.

Authors:  S Temel; E Birnie; H M Sonneveld; A J J Voorham; G J Bonsel; E A P Steegers; S Denktaş
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Parental Characteristics can Explain Why Japanese Women Give Birth to the Smallest Infants in the United States.

Authors:  Naho Morisaki; Ichiro Kawachi; Emily Oken; Takeo Fujiwara
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Fetal Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models: Systems Information on Fetal Biometry and Gross Composition.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  A Retrospective Perinatal Data Analysis of Immigrant and German Women from Representative Birth Cohorts at the Virchow Hospital, Berlin.

Authors:  R Armbrust; R von Rennenberg; M David
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Helicobacter pylori colonization and pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia, spontaneous prematurity, and small for gestational age birth.

Authors:  Wouter J den Hollander; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans; I Lisanne Holster; Vincent W Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Henriëtte A Moll; Guillermo I Perez-Perez; Martin J Blaser; Eric A P Steegers; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Helicobacter       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Patient versus professional based psychosocial risk factor screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Chantal Quispel; Mieke J van Veen; Christianne Zuijderhoudt; Eric A P Steegers; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel; Mijke P Lambregtse-van den Berg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-11

8.  Comparison of Perinatal Data of Immigrant Women of Turkish Origin and German Women - Results of a Prospective Study in Berlin.

Authors:  M David; T Borde; S Brenne; B Ramsauer; W Henrich; J Breckenkamp; O Razum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update until the age of 4 years.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cornelia M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Kidney size and function in a multi-ethnic population-based cohort of school-age children.

Authors:  Hanneke Bakker; Marjolein N Kooijman; Albert J van der Heijden; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; H Rob Taal; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.