OBJECTIVE: To explore women's preferences for, and trade-offs between, key attributes of intrapartum care models. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study using discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and focus groups. SETTING: The North of Scotland. POPULATION: Women from the catchment areas of eight rural maternity units in the North of Scotland. METHODS: Based on current policy, 'model of care' and 'time travelled' were selected as key attributes of intrapartum care in remote and rural settings. A DCE questionnaire explored women's preferences for and trade-offs between these attributes. Focus groups validated the DCE attributes and provided valuable information about the drivers of women's preferences for place of delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences for attributes of intrapartum care. RESULTS: Eight focus groups were conducted, and 877 eligible women completed the questionnaire. Overall, the DCE results found women preferred delivery in a unit to home birth and consultant-led care (CLC) to midwife-managed care (MMC). Women preferring CLC associated it with covering every eventuality and increased safety. Although women preferred shorter travel times, trade-offs indicated a willingness to travel for approximately 2 hours to get one's preferred choice. Focus group findings and subgroup DCE analysis showed heterogeneity of preferences related to experience, risk status, geographic location, perception of care and family circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to service redesign offering local midwife-managed intrapartum care, most rural women in our study expressed a preference to give birth in hospital and have CLC because they felt safer. Women were willing to travel for this but within limits. Qualitative results showed that women's preferences were influenced by their home and family context, beliefs and previous pregnancy experiences. Challenges for service redesign are to provide comprehensive obstetric services within acceptable travel time, while responding to the heterogeneity of women's preferences.
OBJECTIVE: To explore women's preferences for, and trade-offs between, key attributes of intrapartum care models. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study using discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and focus groups. SETTING: The North of Scotland. POPULATION: Women from the catchment areas of eight rural maternity units in the North of Scotland. METHODS: Based on current policy, 'model of care' and 'time travelled' were selected as key attributes of intrapartum care in remote and rural settings. A DCE questionnaire explored women's preferences for and trade-offs between these attributes. Focus groups validated the DCE attributes and provided valuable information about the drivers of women's preferences for place of delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences for attributes of intrapartum care. RESULTS: Eight focus groups were conducted, and 877 eligible women completed the questionnaire. Overall, the DCE results found women preferred delivery in a unit to home birth and consultant-led care (CLC) to midwife-managed care (MMC). Women preferring CLC associated it with covering every eventuality and increased safety. Although women preferred shorter travel times, trade-offs indicated a willingness to travel for approximately 2 hours to get one's preferred choice. Focus group findings and subgroup DCE analysis showed heterogeneity of preferences related to experience, risk status, geographic location, perception of care and family circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to service redesign offering local midwife-managed intrapartum care, most rural women in our study expressed a preference to give birth in hospital and have CLC because they felt safer. Women were willing to travel for this but within limits. Qualitative results showed that women's preferences were influenced by their home and family context, beliefs and previous pregnancy experiences. Challenges for service redesign are to provide comprehensive obstetric services within acceptable travel time, while responding to the heterogeneity of women's preferences.
Authors: Mattijs S Lambooij; Jorien Veldwijk; Paul F van Gils; Anita W M Suijkerbuijk; Jeroen N Struijs Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Agustina Mazzoni; Fernando Althabe; Laura Gutierrez; Luz Gibbons; Nancy H Liu; Ana María Bonotti; Gustavo H Izbizky; Marta Ferrary; Nora Viergue; Silvia I Vigil; Gabriela Zalazar Denett; José M Belizán Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 3.007