Literature DB >> 17903141

Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen.

B Chaffe1, J Ford, V Bills.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the compliance rates for women being offered routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in two obstetric units in the UK. Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a potentially serious condition that can result in substantial morbidity and sometimes death. Current guidelines recommend that 500 IU anti-D immunoglobulin G (IgG) should be offered to all non-sensitized RhD-negative women at 28 and 34 weeks' gestation in order to prevent the risk of RhD sensitization in pregnancy. Implementing guidance, however, remains a challenge. We conducted a retrospective audit of 207 RhD-negative, non-sensitized pregnant women attending obstetric units during 2004 to assess compliance with national guidance on the provision of antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. Informed consent for routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis was documented for 185 of these women. In total, 86.5% of women received the two doses of anti-D IgG. The majority of women received their first and second doses within 1 week of 28 and 34 weeks' gestation (87.0 and 86.0%, respectively). Accurate records of prophylactic anti-D IgG were maintained and updated. This audit demonstrates that the level of patient compliance with the two-dose regimen was high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17903141     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00777.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med        ISSN: 0958-7578            Impact factor:   2.019


  3 in total

1.  A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales.

Authors:  Ala Szczepura; Leeza Osipenko; Karoline Freeman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Rh isoimmunization in Sub-Saharan Africa indicates need for universal access to anti-RhD immunoglobulin and effective management of D-negative pregnancies.

Authors:  Erhabor Osaro; Adias Teddy Charles
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 3.  Appropriate provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women: a scoping review.

Authors:  Trina M Fyfe; M Jane Ritchey; Christorina Taruc; Daniel Crompton; Brian Galliford; Rose Perrin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.