Literature DB >> 17902165

Comparison of reconstructive procedures in primary versus secondary mandibular reconstruction.

William N Andrade1, Joan E Lipa, Christine B Novak, Harpreet Grover, Christian Bang, Ralph W Gilbert, Peter C Neligan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few reports have compared reconstructive outcomes of primary versus secondary mandibular reconstruction.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 149 patients following primary (n = 110) and secondary reconstruction (n = 39).
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographics between the 2 groups. The secondary reconstruction mandibular defects were more extensive; significantly more involved the condyle or the central portion of the mandible. The vascularized fibular flap was most commonly used (primary 82%, secondary 69%). The overall complication rate was similar in both groups. There was no statistical difference in the frequency of complications between the primary or secondary reconstruction groups (acute, p = .40; late, p = .17).
CONCLUSIONS: Success in secondary mandibular reconstruction could be achieved utilizing a range of osseous free flaps, and there was no increased rate of complications compared with primary mandibular reconstructions. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17902165     DOI: 10.1002/hed.20705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  2 in total

1.  Safety of resection margins in CAD/CAM-guided primarily reconstructed oral squamous cell carcinoma-a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Elisabeth Goetze; Maximillian Moergel; Matthias Gielisch; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-08-28

2.  Salvage Secondary Reconstruction of the Mandible with Vascularized Fibula Flap.

Authors:  Dinesh Kadam
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2019-03-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.