Literature DB >> 17902033

How to measure critical health competences: development and validation of the Critical Health Competence Test (CHC Test).

Anke Steckelberg1, Christian Hülfenhaus, Jürgen Kasper, Jürgen Rost, Ingrid Mühlhauser.   

Abstract

Consumers' autonomy regarding health increasingly requires competences to critically appraise health information. Critical health literacy refers to the concept of evidence-based medicine. Instruments to measure these competences in curriculum evaluation and surveys are lacking. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure critical health competences (CHC test). Development and testing of the questionnaire covered three phases: (1) test construction (and feasibility, (2) first field test of scalability and items revision (3) second field test to validate the instrument. Model fit analyses were performed for both field tests for Rasch-, Mixed Rasch- and Hybrid model. Participants were secondary school and university students with and without prior training in evidence-based medicine (1. field test n = 322; with training n = 87; 2. field test n = 107; with training n = 13). The second field test resulted in Rasch scalability of all items in one person class. Mean values (+/-SD) of person parameters were 716.14 (+/-53.74) for trained students and 470.11 (+/-59.63) for untrained students. Reliability of the instrument was 0.91 (WINMIRA ANOVA). In conclusion the CHC instrument is a feasible, reliable and valid instrument to measure critical health literacy. The generalizability of the instrument is to be explored in ongoing studies in different educational settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17902033     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9083-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  25 in total

Review 1.  State of the science of health literacy measures: Validity implications for minority populations.

Authors:  Tam H Nguyen; Hyunjeong Park; Hae-Ra Han; Kitty S Chan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jolie Haun; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-29

2.  Identifying content to improve risk assessment communications within the Risk Profile: Literature reviews and focus groups with expert and non-expert stakeholders.

Authors:  C Ellermann; M McDowell; C O Schirren; A-K Lindemann; S Koch; M Lohmann; M A Jenny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Training of patient and consumer representatives in the basic competencies of evidence-based medicine: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Bettina Berger; Anke Steckelberg; Gabriele Meyer; Jürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  The State of the Science of Health Literacy Measurement.

Authors:  Tam H Nguyen; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Lauren A McCormack
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Understanding critical health literacy: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Susie Sykes; Jane Wills; Gillian Rowlands; Keith Popple
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q).

Authors:  Kristine Sørensen; Stephan Van den Broucke; Jürgen M Pelikan; James Fullam; Gerardine Doyle; Zofia Slonska; Barbara Kondilis; Vivian Stoffels; Richard H Osborne; Helmut Brand
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  An overview of self-administered health literacy instruments.

Authors:  Braden O Neill; Daniela Gonçalves; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Sue Ziebland; Jose Valderas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sibel Vildan Altin; Isabelle Finke; Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Effects of School-Based Educational Interventions for Enhancing Adolescents Abilities in Critical Appraisal of Health Claims: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lena V Nordheim; Malene W Gundersen; Birgitte Espehaug; Øystein Guttersrud; Signe Flottorp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of numerical information on risk knowledge regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among schoolgirls: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anke Steckelberg; Martina Albrecht; Anna Kezle; Jürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.