Literature DB >> 17901728

The comparative study of craniofacial structural characteristic of individuals with different types of cleft palate.

Da-wei Lu1, Bing Shi, Heng-jian Wang, Qian Zheng.   

Abstract

To compare craniofacial structural characteristic of individuals with different types of cleft palate and to lay a foundation for better treatment protocol for patients with cleft palate, we chose a sample consisting of 12 patients with Treacher Collin syndrome, 15 patients with Pierre Robin sequence, 40 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate, and 40 patients with isolated cleft palate who met certain criteria. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained from each subject. A total of 22 variables, comprising 11 angular, 9 linear, and 2 ratio measurements, were studied. The z-scores were analyzed during paired Student t test. The data showed us that there seems to be no difference in craniofacial structures between patients with isolated cleft palate and normal persons. Patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate who had only cleft lip repaired exhibit such characteristics as midface retrusion, relatively excessive lower facial height, and more obtuse gonial angle. The cranial base areas of individuals with Treacher Collin syndrome and Pierre Robin sequence are similar to those of normal persons. Mandibular hypoplasia in both vertical and horizontal dimensions and maxillary retrusion can be found in patients with Treacher Collin syndrome, while only mandibular hypoplasia in the horizontal dimension can be found in patients with Pierre Robin sequence. The developmental deficiency of craniofacial structures seems to be a separate deformity, not the direct outcome of cleft palate defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17901728     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318031d8a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  2 in total

1.  The Craniofacial Morphology in Adult Patients with Unoperated Isolated Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Zhongtai Ye; Xue Xu; Adalet Ahmatjian; Shi Bing
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 13.567

2.  Psychological impact of visible differences in patients with congenital craniofacial anomalies.

Authors:  Varun Pratap Singh; Timothy P Moss
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.