OBJECTIVES: Exploring terminal patients' perceptions of GPs' role in delivering continuous end-of-life care and identifying barriers to this. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study with patients (two consecutive interviews). SETTING: Primary care Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen terminally ill cancer patients, informed about diagnosis and prognosis. RESULTS: Terminal patients attribute a pivotal role to GPs in different aspects of two types of continuity. Relational continuity: having an ongoing relationship with the same GP, of which important aspects are eg, keeping in touch after referral and feeling responsible for the patient. Informational continuity: use of information on past events and personal circumstances to provide individualised care, of which important aspects are eg, exchange of information between GPs, specialists and care facilities. Patients also identify barriers to continuity eg, lack of time and of GPs' initiative. CONCLUSIONS: At the end of life when physicians can no longer rely on biomedical models of diagnosis-therapy-cure, patients' perspectives are of utmost importance. This qualitative study made it possible to gain insights into terminal patients' perceptions of continuous primary end-of-life care. It clarifies the concept and identifies barriers to it.
OBJECTIVES: Exploring terminal patients' perceptions of GPs' role in delivering continuous end-of-life care and identifying barriers to this. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study with patients (two consecutive interviews). SETTING: Primary care Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen terminally ill cancerpatients, informed about diagnosis and prognosis. RESULTS: Terminal patients attribute a pivotal role to GPs in different aspects of two types of continuity. Relational continuity: having an ongoing relationship with the same GP, of which important aspects are eg, keeping in touch after referral and feeling responsible for the patient. Informational continuity: use of information on past events and personal circumstances to provide individualised care, of which important aspects are eg, exchange of information between GPs, specialists and care facilities. Patients also identify barriers to continuity eg, lack of time and of GPs' initiative. CONCLUSIONS: At the end of life when physicians can no longer rely on biomedical models of diagnosis-therapy-cure, patients' perspectives are of utmost importance. This qualitative study made it possible to gain insights into terminal patients' perceptions of continuous primary end-of-life care. It clarifies the concept and identifies barriers to it.
Authors: Anne Dahlhaus; Nicholas Vanneman; Andrea Siebenhofer; Marie Brosche; Corina Guethlin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Joshua D Shadd; Fred Burge; Kelli I Stajduhar; S Robin Cohen; Mary Lou Kelley; Barbara Pesut Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Thijs Reyniers; Dirk Houttekier; H Roeline Pasman; Robert Vander Stichele; Joachim Cohen; Luc Deliens Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Koen Meeussen; Lieve Van den Block; Nathalie Bossuyt; Michael Echteld; Johan Bilsen; Luc Deliens Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 3.295