Literature DB >> 17901080

A comparison between coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and drug eluting stent for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in elderly patients (aged > or =75 years).

Tullio Palmerini1, Fabio Barlocco, Andrea Santarelli, Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani, Carlo Savini, Elisa Baldini, Laura Alessi, Michele Ruffini, Germano Di Credico, Giancarlo Piovaccari, Roberto Di Bartolomeo, Antonio Marzocchi, Angelo Branzi, Stefano De Servi.   

Abstract

AIMS: In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of elderly patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis treated with either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or drug-eluting stent (DES). METHODS AND
RESULTS: From January 2003 to April 2006, 259 patients with ULMCA stenosis and age > or =75 years underwent coronary revascularization with either CABG or DES. One hundred and sixty-one patients were treated with CABG and 98 with DES. The cumulative unadjusted rates of 2-year mortality were 17% in CABG-treated patients and 18% in those treated with DES (P = 0.71). The adjusted rates of 2-year survival were 85% for CABG-treated patients and 87% for DES-treated patients (P = 0.74). The incidence of 2-year myocardial infarction was 6% in CABG-treated patients and 4% in DES-treated patients (P = 0.11). The incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 3% in CABG-treated patients and 25% in DES-treated patients (P < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, peripheral vascular disease, left ventricular ejection fraction and acute coronary syndrome were independent predictors of 2-year mortality.
CONCLUSION: In this study, we could not demonstrate a difference in mortality between CABG-treated patients and those treated with DES. However, the rate of TLR was higher in the DES group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17901080     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  12 in total

1.  Bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main disease. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Desch; E Boudriot; A Rastan; P E Buszman; A Bochenek; F W Mohr; G Schuler; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-26

3.  Coronary surgery in elderly: it is never too late.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Chivasso; Umberto Benedetto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Impact of SYNTAX score on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nozue; Ryo Kamijima; Taku Iwaki; Ichiro Michishita
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-07-25

5.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Hsin-Ru Li; Chiao-Po Hsu; Shih-Hsien Sung; Chun-Che Shih; Shing-Jong Lin; Wan-Leong Chan; Cheng-Hsueh Wu; Tse-Min Lu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.672

6.  Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay B Pandya; Young-Hak Kim; Sheridan N Meyers; Charles J Davidson; James D Flaherty; Duk-Woo Park; Anuj Mediratta; Karen Pieper; Eric Reyes; Robert O Bonow; Seung-Jung Park; Nirat Beohar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Angioplasty of unprotected left main coronary stenosis: Real world experience of a single-operator group from eastern India.

Authors:  Shuvanan Ray; Alok Mazumder; Soumitra Kumar; Prithwiraj Bhattacharjee; David Rozario; Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay; Sanjeev S Mukherjee; P K Deb; Amal Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-01-18

Review 8.  Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Lin Zhang; Qing-Qing Zhu; Jing-Jing Yang; Yu-Han Chen; Yang Li; Su-Hui Zhu; Jun Xie; Lian Wang; Li-Na Kang; Biao Xu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Outcomes of a percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians.

Authors:  Rokas Šerpytis; Lina Puodžiukaitė; Saulius Petrauskas; Nerijus Misonis; Mantas Kurminas; Aleksandras Laucevičius; Pranas Šerpytis
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2018

Review 10.  Drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials and seventeen observational studies.

Authors:  Qing Li; Zhi Zhang; Rui-Xing Yin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.