Literature DB >> 17900758

Safety and cost savings of an improved three-day rule for stool culture in hospitalised children and adults.

L Seyler1, A Lalvani, L Collins, L Goddard, I C J W Bowler.   

Abstract

Stools sent for culture from patients after three days of hospitalisation have a low yield (<1%) for bacterial enteric pathogens (BEP), excluding Clostridium difficile, and are expensive to process. A 'three-day rule' for rejection of specimens has previously been validated in adults. We evaluated a three-day rule for paediatric stool samples by retrospective review of all stool culture results from 1995 to 2002. Excluding C. difficile, yield for BEP in samples sent within three days following admission was 97/3751 (2.59%) compared with 3/1511 (0.2%) in samples sent more than three days after admission. The criteria for culture would have been met if the rule had been applied for these three samples. We prospectively evaluated potential savings if the rule were applied for both children and adults over a two-month period in 2000. Savings were greater for adults than for children. Of 490 stools from children, 38 (7.8%) samples did not meet the criteria for culture and of 206 stools from adult patients, 64 (31%) did not meet the criteria for culture. We implemented the rule between 1 March 2003 and 31 March 2006. A total of 14 439 stool samples were received from inpatients requesting culture for BEP, excluding C. difficile. Of these, 5744 (39.8%) were rejected because the criteria for culture were not met. This was estimated as an annual saving of 11,848 pounds to the Trust laboratory. If extrapolated to all NHS Trusts, the potential savings could be in the order of 1.18 million pounds annually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17900758     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recognition and prevention of hospital-associated enteric infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Andrea J Linscott
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  A parallel diagnostic accuracy study of three molecular panels for the detection of bacterial gastroenteritis.

Authors:  J S Biswas; A Al-Ali; P Rajput; D Smith; S D Goldenberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Reply to Beal et al., 'The "3-Day Rule" for Stool Tests May Not Apply When Using PCR Panels'.

Authors:  G W Procop; D Nikolic; K Asamoto; R Wyllie; R Tuttle; S S Richter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The "3-Day Rule" for Stool Tests May Not Apply When Using PCR Panels.

Authors:  Stacy G Beal; Lymaries Velez; Elizabeth E Tremblay; Steven Toffel; Kenneth H Rand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.