Literature DB >> 17900584

Infracoccygeal sacropexy or sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

R de Tayrac1, M-L Mathé, G Bader, X Deffieux, A Fazel, H Fernandez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare infracoccygeal sacropexy (IS) and sacrospinous suspension (SS) for the treatment of uterine or vault prolapse.
METHODS: A randomized trial of 49 women assigned to either the IS group using IVS tape (n=24) or SS group (n=25). Concomitant hysterectomy and repairs were performed as appropriate. Evaluations included prolapse staging using the POP-Q system and validated questionnaires for symptoms (PFDI), quality of life (PFIQ), and sexuality (PISQ-12). The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain.
RESULTS: Patients' characteristics were similar in both groups. IS was quicker, easier, and less painful than SS (P<0.01). Hemorrhage or hematoma rates were similar. Neither rectal injury nor vaginal erosion occurred. Mean follow-up was 16.8 months. Prolapse cure rates, symptom scores, and quality of life were similar. Postoperative cystocele occurred in 4.8% of women after IS and 25% after SS (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Infracoccygeal sacropexy is equivalent to sacrospinous suspension, with a decreased rate of postoperative pain and cystocele recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17900584     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and bladder function.

Authors:  Kaven Baessler; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review.

Authors:  Christopher M Maher; Benny Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Cathryn M A Glazener
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Changes in voiding function after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a cohort study of 76 cases.

Authors:  Xiao-Chen Song; Lan Zhu; Shuo Liang; Tao Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Posterior intravaginal slingplasty: efficacy and complications in a continuous series of 118 cases.

Authors:  Stefano Cosma; Mario Preti; Marco Mitidieri; Paolo Petruzzelli; Federica Possavino; Guido Menato
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Incidence and Management of De Novo Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.

Authors:  Henry Tran; Doreen E Chung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Anatomical and functional outcomes of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for the treatment of vaginal vault or uterine prolapse: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Young-Suk Lee; Deok Hyun Han; Ji Youl Lee; Joon Chul Kim; Myung-Soo Choo; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

Review 7.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mahdyie Doaee; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Abbas Nourmohammadi; Seid Kazem Razavi-Ratki; Marzieh Nojomi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty versus Unilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse.

Authors:  Virva Nyyssönen; Anne Talvensaari-Mattila; Markku Santala
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08-13

Review 10.  Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Corina Christmann-Schmid; Nir Haya; Julie Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.