Literature DB >> 17900456

Diagnostic performance of fractional excretion of urea and fractional excretion of sodium in the evaluations of patients with acute kidney injury with or without diuretic treatment.

Marie-Noëlle Pépin1, Josée Bouchard, Louis Legault, Jean Ethier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) for the diagnosis of transient acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by decreased kidney perfusion is reported to be low in patients administered diuretics. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing the performance of fractional excretion of urea (FEur) with that of FENa to distinguish between transient and persistent AKI. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 99 patients hospitalized at a tertiary-care center who developed AKI (>or=30% increase in serum creatinine level from baseline within 1 week). INDEX TEST: FEur and FENa were calculated for each patient. REFERENCE TEST & MEASUREMENTS: Patients were classified as having transient or persistent AKI according to the clinical context and whether serum creatinine level returned to baseline within 7 days. Each group also was subdivided according to exposure to diuretics. FEur of 35% or less and FENa of 1% or less were used to define transient AKI. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each index test.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of FEur were 48% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 79% and 33% in patients administered diuretics. Sensitivity and specificity of FENa were 78% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 58% and 81% in those administered diuretics. Receiver operating characteristic curves did not identify a better diagnostic cutoff value for FEur or FENa. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, variable exposure to diuretics, and a high proportion of preexisting chronic kidney disease.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients without diuretic use, FENa is better able to distinguish transient from persistent AKI. In patients administered diuretics, this distinction cannot be made accurately by means of FENa. FEur cannot be used as an alternative tool because it lacks specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17900456     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  41 in total

1.  Urinary calprotectin and the distinction between prerenal and intrinsic acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Frank Heller; Sandra Frischmann; Maria Grünbaum; Walter Zidek; Timm H Westhoff
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Fractional excretion of potassium in the course of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: potential monitoring tool?

Authors:  Alexandre Toledo Maciel; Marcelo Park; Etienne Macedo
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of urinary sodium, chloride, urea, and flow.

Authors:  Robert W Schrier
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Early intervention in acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Robert W Schrier
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Biomarkers predict progression of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jay L Koyner; Amit X Garg; Steven G Coca; Kyaw Sint; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Uptal D Patel; Michael G Shlipak; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Effect of Loop Diuretics on the Fractional Excretion of Urea in Decompensated Heart Failure.

Authors:  Zachary L Cox; Krishna Sury; Veena S Rao; Juan B Ivey-Miranda; Matthew Griffin; Devin Mahoney; Nicole Gomez; James H Fleming; Lesley A Inker; Steven G Coca; Jeff Turner; F Perry Wilson; Jeffrey M Testani
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Utility of fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury in children.

Authors:  Hisayo Fujita; Masayoshi Shinjoh; Tomohiro Ishii; Midori Awazu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Urine biochemistry assessment in critically ill patients: controversies and future perspectives.

Authors:  Alexandre Toledo Maciel; Daniel Vitorio
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Acute tubular necrosis and pre-renal acute kidney injury: utility of urine microscopy in their evaluation- a systematic review.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Benan Kasapoglu; Mark A Perazella
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Physiological biomarkers of acute kidney injury: a conceptual approach to improving outcomes.

Authors:  Mark D Okusa; Bertrand L Jaber; Peter Doran; Jacques Duranteau; Li Yang; Patrick T Murray; Ravindra L Mehta; Can Ince
Journal:  Contrib Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.