Literature DB >> 17900436

Online availability of hormonal contraceptives without a health care examination: effect of knowledge and health care screening.

Alexa P Kaskowitz1, Nichole Carlson, Mark Nichols, Alison Edelman, Jeffrey Jensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to investigate whether the knowledge of women using an online resource to obtain hormonal contraceptives (HCs) without a health care examination is similar to women who obtain HC in the clinic. STUDY
DESIGN: Women who accessed HC prescriptions online or through a clinic visit were offered an anonymous self-administered survey regarding the contraindications to and possible complications of HC. Tests of equivalence were used to compare the mean scores between the two populations.
RESULTS: Online users (n=243) were older, more affluent, more educated, and more likely to be insured than clinic patients (n=161). The two populations demonstrated equivalent HC knowledge [contraindications (mean score, 95% confidence interval): clinic 81.1% (77.2-85.0%), online 85.0% (82.0-88.0%); complications: clinic 77.6% (72.7-82.6%), online 82.1% (78.8-85.5%)]. The online population remained equivalent or superior to the clinic population in an age-restricted analysis.
CONCLUSION: Women who self-select to obtain HC prescriptions online demonstrate at least equivalent knowledge of potential HC risks as women seen in a clinic encounter without a pelvic examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17900436      PMCID: PMC2706829          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: Current practice vs evidence.

Authors:  F H Stewart; C C Harper; C E Ellertson; D A Grimes; G F Sawaya; J Trussell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Primary and preventive care: periodic assessments.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Development and validation of an instrument to determine patient knowledge: the oral anticoagulation knowledge test.

Authors:  Mario M Zeolla; Michael R Brodeur; Angela Dominelli; Stuart T Haines; Nicole D Allie
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 4.  Safety concerns and health benefits associated with oral contraception.

Authors:  Ronald Burkman; James J Schlesselman; Miriam Zieman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Benefits of a computer-assisted education program for hypertensive patients compared with standard education tools.

Authors:  S M Consoli; M Ben Said; J Jean; J Menard; P F Plouin; G Chatellier
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1995-09
  5 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Measuring oral contraceptive knowledge: a review of research findings and limitations.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Paula M Castaño; Patricia W Stone; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-16

2.  The impact of an educational text message intervention on young urban women's knowledge of oral contraception.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Carolyn L Westhoff; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kate Grindlay; Rick Li; Joseph E Potter; James Trussell; Kelly Blanchard
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.375

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.