Literature DB >> 17900324

Grasp or brush for biliary sampling at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography? A blinded randomized controlled trial.

Jean-Marc Dumonceau1, Carlos Macias Gomez, Claudia Casco, Muriel Genevay, Mariano Marcolongo, Massimo Bongiovanni, Philippe Morel, Pietro Majno, Antoine Hadengue.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Brushing, the standard sampling method at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), lacks sensitivity for cancer detection. We assessed a novel sampling method using a grasping basket.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients with a suspected malignant biliary stricture were randomized to biliary sampling at ERC using a basket (basket group, N = 30) or a brush (brush group, N = 26), followed by the alternate device. When deemed necessary, strictures were dilated (using 6-mm balloons exclusively). The primary end point was sensitivity for cancer detection at cytopathological examination of the first sample collected in each patient; the cytopathologist was blinded to clinical details and sampling method. All analyses followed an intention-to-treat principle.
RESULTS: All 56 patients had successful sampling with both techniques; 50 (89%) had a final diagnosis of malignant stricture. Sensitivity for cancer detection with the first sample collected in each patient was significantly higher in the basket compared to brush group (20/25 [80%]vs 12/25 [48%], respectively, P= 0.018, OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.24-15.21). Seventeen (34%) of the 50 sample pairs collected from malignant cases showed discordant cytopathological results: 15 patients had a positive basket and a negative brush result while two had the inverse association (P= 0.002, OR 7.5, 95% CI 1.65-47.44). Basketting more frequently yielded positive samples from malignant strictures in case of presampling balloon dilation (27/32 [84%]vs 10/18 [56%], respectively, P= 0.043, OR 4.32, 95% CI 1.14-16.37). Specificity was 100% (both methods).
CONCLUSION: Biliary sampling at ERC using a dedicated basket provided a significantly higher sensitivity for cancer detection than brushing; presampling stricture dilation significantly increased sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17900324     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01543.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Boris Blechacz; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Triple modality testing by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Arjun Nanda; Jason M Brown; Stephen H Berger; Melinda M Lewis; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Gregory J Gores; Steven A Keilin; Kevin E Woods; Qiang Cai; Field F Willingham
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Endoscopic diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Kiichi Tamada; Jun Ushio; Kentaro Sugano
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

4.  Malignant biliary stenosis: conventional cytology versus DNA image cytometry.

Authors:  Janek Binek; Nadja Lindenmann; Christa M Meyenberger; Margarete Hell; Hanno Ulmer; Peter Spieler; Jan Borovicka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Mehmet Bilgin; Hüseyin Toprak; Mehmet Burgazli; S Sennur Bilgin; Ritvan Chasan; Ali Erdogan; Cem Balcı
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-03-12

Review 6.  Brush Cytology, Forceps Biopsy, or Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling for Diagnosis of Bile Duct Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seung Bae Yoon; Sung-Hoon Moon; Sung Woo Ko; Hyun Lim; Ho Suk Kang; Jong Hyeok Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 7.  Challenging biliary strictures: pathophysiological features, differential diagnosis, diagnostic algorithms, and new clinically relevant biomarkers - part 1.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Myriam Delhaye; Nicolas Charette; Annarita Farina
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  High Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Brush Cytology for Indeterminate Strictures.

Authors:  Abdulsemed M Nur; Misbah Salim; Scott Boerner; Suqing Li; Cindy C Y Law; Leanne Edwards; Kaitlin Ryan; Paul D James
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-05

9.  Outcomes of Different Methods for Analysis of Biliary Brush Cytology and of Factors Associated with Positive Diagnosis in an Age-Dependent Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Mariana Costa; Jorge Canena; Luís Mascarenhas-Lemos; Rafaela Loureiro; Mário Silva; Diana Carvalho; Tiago Capela; Pedro Russo; Gonçalo Ramos; António Mateus-Dias; Mário Ferraz-Oliveira; Pedro Mota Veiga; João Coimbra
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Ming Chen; Kuo-Liang Wei; Yi-Shing Chen; Pey-Jium Chang; Shui-Yi Tung; Te-Sheng Chang; Hao-Chun Huang; Chein-Heng Shen; Yung-Yu Hsieh; Cheng-Shyong Wu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.754

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.