Literature DB >> 17899364

A comparative study of genome-wide SNP, CGH microarray and protein expression analysis to explore genotypic and phenotypic mechanisms of acquired antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer.

Neil Johnson1, Valerie Speirs, Nicola J Curtin, Andrew G Hall.   

Abstract

Allelic imbalance is a common feature of many malignancies. We have measured allelic imbalance in genomic DNA from the breast cancer cell lines T47D, MDA-MB-231, two antiestrogen sensitive (MCF7N and MCF7L) and two resistant MCF7 cell lines (MMU2 and LCC9) using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) oligonucleotide microarrays. DNA from MCF7(L) and MMU2 cells was also analysed by comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) to compare with SNP microarray data. Proteins previously determined to be involved in disease progression were quantified by Western blot and compared to array data. The SNP and CGH array both detected cytogenetic abnormalities commonly found in breast cancer: amplification of chromosomes 11q13-14.1, 17q and 20q containing cyclin D1, BCAS1 and 3 (Breast Cancer Amplified Sequence) and AIB1 (Amplified in Breast cancer) genes; losses at 6q, 9p and X chromosomes, which included ERalpha (Estrogen Receptor alpha) and p16 ( INK4A ) genes. However the SNP chip array data additionally identified regions of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) followed by duplication of the remaining allele-uniparental disomy (UPD). Good concordance between SNP arrays and CGH analyses was observed, however there was poor correlation between gene copy number and protein levels between the cell lines. There were reductions in ERalpha, cyclin D1 and p27 protein levels whilst p21 protein levels were elevated in antiestrogen resistant MCF7 cell lines. Although protein levels varied there was no difference in gene copy number. This study shows SNP and CGH array analysis are powerful tools for analysis of allelic imbalance in breast cancer. However, the antiestrogen resistant phenotype was likely to be due to changes in gene expression and protein degradation rather than in altered gene copy number.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899364     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9758-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis and consequences of uniparental disomy in cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Makishima; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  High-throughput ectopic expression screen for tamoxifen resistance identifies an atypical kinase that blocks autophagy.

Authors:  Laura Gonzalez-Malerva; Jaehong Park; Lihua Zou; Yanhui Hu; Zahra Moradpour; Joseph Pearlberg; Jacqueline Sawyer; Hallam Stevens; Ed Harlow; Joshua LaBaer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Superficial spreading and nodular melanoma are distinct biological entities: a challenge to the linear progression model.

Authors:  Holly S Greenwald; Erica B Friedman; Iman Osman
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  An integrative multi-dimensional genetic and epigenetic strategy to identify aberrant genes and pathways in cancer.

Authors:  Raj Chari; Bradley P Coe; Emily A Vucic; William W Lockwood; Wan L Lam
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-05-17

5.  Prediction of epigenetically regulated genes in breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Leandro A Loss; Anguraj Sadanandam; Steffen Durinck; Shivani Nautiyal; Diane Flaucher; Victoria E H Carlton; Martin Moorhead; Yontao Lu; Joe W Gray; Malek Faham; Paul Spellman; Bahram Parvin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Cancer gene prioritization by integrative analysis of mRNA expression and DNA copy number data: a comparative review.

Authors:  Leo Lahti; Martin Schäfer; Hans-Ulrich Klein; Silvio Bicciato; Martin Dugas
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Combined analysis of eIF4E and 4E-binding protein expression predicts breast cancer survival and estimates eIF4E activity.

Authors:  L J Coleman; M B Peter; T J Teall; R A Brannan; A M Hanby; H Honarpisheh; A M Shaaban; L Smith; V Speirs; E T Verghese; J N McElwaine; T A Hughes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Pre-clinical evaluation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and 1 inhibition in anti-estrogen-sensitive and resistant breast cancer cells.

Authors:  N Johnson; J Bentley; L-Z Wang; D R Newell; C N Robson; G I Shapiro; N J Curtin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Multi-platform whole-genome microarray analyses refine the epigenetic signature of breast cancer metastasis with gene expression and copy number.

Authors:  Joseph Andrews; Wendy Kennette; Jenna Pilon; Alexandra Hodgson; Alan B Tuck; Ann F Chambers; David I Rodenhiser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  CG0009, a novel glycogen synthase kinase 3 inhibitor, induces cell death through cyclin D1 depletion in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Hyun Mi Kim; Choung-Soo Kim; Je-Hwan Lee; Se Jin Jang; Jung Jin Hwang; Seonggu Ro; Jene Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.