Liyan Miao1, Jian Yang, Chenrong Huang, Zhenya Shen. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology Research Lab, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. miaolysuzhou@163.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the contribution of the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes and age, body size, and weight of the patients to the warfarin dose requirement in a Chinese population. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 178 Chinese patients with stable warfarin dose requirements and an international normalized ratio (INR) of the prothrombin time within the target range (1.5-3.0). The polymorphisms for the VKORC1 (-1639GA) and CYP2C9*3 genotypes, venous INR, and plasma concentration and unbound concentration of warfarin were then analyzed. RESULTS: VKORC1 (-1639G>A) genotyping showed that 149 patients were homozygous AA, 28 were heterozygous GA, and one was homozygous for the GG genotype. CYP2C9*3 genotyping showed that 162 patients were *1/*1, and 16 patients were heterozygous *1/*3. Patients with the VKORC1(-1639 GG+GA) (3.32 +/- 1.02 mg/day) and CYP2C9*1/*1 (2.06 +/- 0.82 mg/day) genotypes required a significantly higher warfarin dose than those with the -1639 AA (1.76 +/- 0.57 mg/day; P < 0.001) or CYP2C9*1/*3 (1.60 +/- 1.29 mg/day; P < 0.001), genotype. The multiple linear regression model for warfarin dose indicated significant contributions from age (r (2) = 0.084; P < 0.001), weight (r (2) = 0.063; P < 0.001), VKORC1 genotype (r (2) = 0.494; P < 0.001), and age, weight, and CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype together (r (2) = 0.628; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that age, weight and the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 polymorphism affect warfarin dose requirements in our sample of Chinese patients receiving long-term therapy and showing stable control of anticoagulation. It is anticipated that the use of dosing regimens modified by taking into account the contribution of age, weight, and the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes has the potential to improve the safety of warfarin therapy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the contribution of the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes and age, body size, and weight of the patients to the warfarin dose requirement in a Chinese population. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 178 Chinese patients with stable warfarin dose requirements and an international normalized ratio (INR) of the prothrombin time within the target range (1.5-3.0). The polymorphisms for the VKORC1 (-1639GA) and CYP2C9*3 genotypes, venous INR, and plasma concentration and unbound concentration of warfarin were then analyzed. RESULTS:VKORC1 (-1639G>A) genotyping showed that 149 patients were homozygous AA, 28 were heterozygous GA, and one was homozygous for the GG genotype. CYP2C9*3 genotyping showed that 162 patients were *1/*1, and 16 patients were heterozygous *1/*3. Patients with the VKORC1(-1639 GG+GA) (3.32 +/- 1.02 mg/day) and CYP2C9*1/*1 (2.06 +/- 0.82 mg/day) genotypes required a significantly higher warfarin dose than those with the -1639 AA (1.76 +/- 0.57 mg/day; P < 0.001) or CYP2C9*1/*3 (1.60 +/- 1.29 mg/day; P < 0.001), genotype. The multiple linear regression model for warfarin dose indicated significant contributions from age (r (2) = 0.084; P < 0.001), weight (r (2) = 0.063; P < 0.001), VKORC1 genotype (r (2) = 0.494; P < 0.001), and age, weight, and CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype together (r (2) = 0.628; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that age, weight and the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 polymorphism affect warfarin dose requirements in our sample of Chinese patients receiving long-term therapy and showing stable control of anticoagulation. It is anticipated that the use of dosing regimens modified by taking into account the contribution of age, weight, and the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes has the potential to improve the safety of warfarin therapy.
Authors: A-K Hamberg; M-L Dahl; M Barban; M G Scordo; M Wadelius; V Pengo; R Padrini; E N Jonsson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: L Poller; C R Shiach; P K MacCallum; A M Johansen; A M Münster; A Magalhães; J Jespersen Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Ellie Danielson; Yves Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Steven R Deitcher; Mary Cushman; Stephan Moll; Craig M Kessler; C Gregory Elliott; Rolf Paulson; Turnly Wong; Kenneth A Bauer; Bruce A Schwartz; Joseph P Miletich; Henri Bounameaux; Robert J Glynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Farhad Kamali; Tayyaba Irfan Khan; Barry P King; Richard Frearson; Patrick Kesteven; Peter Wood; Ann K Daly; Hilary Wynne Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M Wadelius; K Sörlin; O Wallerman; J Karlsson; Q-Y Yue; P K E Magnusson; C Wadelius; H Melhus Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2004 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Simone Rost; Andreas Fregin; Vytautas Ivaskevicius; Ernst Conzelmann; Konstanze Hörtnagel; Hans-Joachim Pelz; Knut Lappegard; Erhard Seifried; Inge Scharrer; Edward G D Tuddenham; Clemens R Müller; Tim M Strom; Johannes Oldenburg Journal: Nature Date: 2004-02-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nita A Limdi; T Mark Beasley; Michael R Crowley; Joyce A Goldstein; Mark J Rieder; David A Flockhart; Donna K Arnett; Ronald T Acton; Nianjun Liu Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.533