| Literature DB >> 17897469 |
Nicola J Patron1, Ross F Waller, Anton J Cozijnsen, David C Straney, Donald M Gardiner, William C Nierman, Barbara J Howlett.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genes responsible for biosynthesis of fungal secondary metabolites are usually tightly clustered in the genome and co-regulated with metabolite production. Epipolythiodioxopiperazines (ETPs) are a class of secondary metabolite toxins produced by disparate ascomycete fungi and implicated in several animal and plant diseases. Gene clusters responsible for their production have previously been defined in only two fungi. Fungal genome sequence data have been surveyed for the presence of putative ETP clusters and cluster data have been generated from several fungal taxa where genome sequences are not available. Phylogenetic analysis of cluster genes has been used to investigate the assembly and heredity of these gene clusters.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17897469 PMCID: PMC2045112 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Structures of a/the core moiety of an epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP); b/sirodesmin PL; c/gliotoxin.
Figure 2Putative ETP biosynthetic gene clusters in ascomycetes. Genes (white text on black background) include those with best matches to non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (P), thioredoxin reductase (T), methyl transferases (M and N), glutathione S-transferase (G) and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (C), ACCS (I), dipeptidase (J), as well as a transcriptional regulator (Z) and a transporter (A – Multi Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) or ABC). In addition genes with predicted roles in modification of the side chains of the core ETP moiety are noted (see Table 1). Genes with no lettering are either hypothetical or have no strong matches to ETP cluster genes. Genes shaded in grey are predicted to flank the cluster and encode proteins with best matches to proteins with no potential roles in ETP biosynthesis. The cluster in T. virens might be incomplete as a gene common to ETP cluster was at one end of a single cosmid clone. In M. grisea G and M, and P, J and K are annotated as fused genes. The arrangement of genes in S. diversum is based on the sirodesmin PL cluster in L. maculans; the dashed line represents unsequenced regions. '#2' after taxon name indicates that this is the second cluster found in that species.
Genes in epipolythiodioxopiperazines (ETP) biosynthetic gene clusters
| Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase | |
| Thioredoxin reductase | |
| Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase | |
| Aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase (ACCS) | |
| Dipeptidase domain. | |
| Glutathione | |
| Methyl transferase domain | |
| Transporter | |
| Zinc binuclear cluster (Zn(II)2Cys6) regulator | |
| Prenyl transferase | |
| Aldehyde reductase | |
| Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase | |
| Progesterone 5-B reductase | |
| Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase | |
| Progesterone 5-B reductase | |
| Progesterone 5-B reductase | |
| Hypothetical protein | |
| Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase | |
| Acetyl transferase |
Cluster genes predicted in the biosynthesis in sirodesmin PL and gliotoxin in Leptosphaeria maculans and Aspergillus fumigatus, respectively (P, T, C, I, J, M, G, N,), as well as transporter (A) and transcriptional regulator (Z). Genes predicted to be involved in biosynthesis of side chains of these two ETPs are also listed (D, O, E, S, B, R, Q, K, F, H) [3, 4].
Figure 3Phylogenetic relationships between individual proteins encoded in ETP gene clusters. (a) Two module non-ribosomal peptide synthetase P; (b) cytochrome P450 monooxygenase C; (c) glutathione S-transferase G; (d) ACCS I; (e), dipeptidase J; (f) O-methyl transferase M. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap support values from (left to right or top to bottom) PhyML and WEIGHBOR. Proteins encoded within clusters are on coloured branches, and non-cluster paralogues are on black branches. Consistent cluster relationships across the six proteins are indicated by orange (subclade I), pink (subclade II) and light and dark green (subclades IIIA and IIIB, respectively). Proteins encoded in clusters outside of the main cluster clade are on blue branches. '#2' after taxon name indicates that this is the second cluster found in that species, as per Figure 2.
Figure 4Maximum likelihood phylogeny inferred from six concatenated proteins encoded in ETP gene clusters. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap supports obtained from PhyML. Filled circles indicate that Approximate Unbiased (AU) tests rejected alternate topologies that disrupt these nodes (p < 0.003 in all cases). Open circle indicates that disruption of this node was not rejected. '#2' after taxon name indicates that this is the second cluster found in that species, as per Figure 2.
Figure 5Phylogenetic relationships between ascomycetes derived from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences showing the presence and subclade type of ETP-like gene clusters. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap supports obtained from phyML. Cluster genes are coloured according to position within the phylogeny (identical colours to the branches in Fig. 3). The state of completeness of genome sequencing programs is shown where: * indicates that the genome is in assembly; ** indicates genome sequencing is in progress; xN indicates present coverage of the genome sequence, other information about the genome sequences is given in Additional file 1. Cluster details are as described in Fig. 2.
Figure 6Possible patterns of inheritance and loss of ETP-like clusters in ascomycetes. Possible patterns of cluster inheritance and loss are mapped onto a conservative ascomycete phylogeny based on the 18S rDNA phylogeny (Fig. 5) with poorly supported nodes (<70 bootstraps) collapsed. Only taxa known to contain ETP clusters, or for which there is greater than X4 genomic sequence coverage are included to avoid falsely designating cluster loss events. Rectangles show presence and subclade type of cluster in a lineage (colours are as Fig. 3, black and grey indicate ancestral clusters). Circles indicate lineage-specific cluster loss events, where colours indicates subclade type loss, black indicates loss of all clusters, and open circle indicates loss of a cluster of unknown subclade type. Two possible scenarios are compared: (a) vertical inheritance only with the minimal number (17) of cluster losses; and (b) cluster divergence and spread by lateral transfer (arrows).