PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of patient motion on quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps in ischemic stroke patients and to evaluate the efficacy of a motion-correction scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perfusion data from 25 ischemic stroke patients were selected for analysis. Two motion profiles were applied to a digital anthropomorphic brain phantom to estimate accuracy. CBF images were generated for motion-corrupted and motion-corrected data. To correct for motion, rigid-body registration was performed. The realignment parameters and mean CBF in regions of interest were recorded. RESULTS: All patient data with motion exhibited visibly reduced intervolume misalignment after motion correction. Improved flow delineation between different tissues and a more clearly defined ischemic lesion (IL) were achieved in the motion-corrected CBF. A significant difference occurred in the IL (P < 0.05) for patients with severe motion with an average difference between corrupted and corrected data of 4.8 mL/minute/100 g. The phantom data supported the patient results with better CBF accuracy after motion correction and high registration accuracy (<1 mm translational and <1 degrees rotational error). CONCLUSION: Motion degrades flow differentiation between adjacent tissues in CBF maps and can cause ischemic severity to be underestimated. A registration motion correction scheme improves dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MR perfusion estimates. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of patient motion on quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps in ischemic strokepatients and to evaluate the efficacy of a motion-correction scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perfusion data from 25 ischemic strokepatients were selected for analysis. Two motion profiles were applied to a digital anthropomorphic brain phantom to estimate accuracy. CBF images were generated for motion-corrupted and motion-corrected data. To correct for motion, rigid-body registration was performed. The realignment parameters and mean CBF in regions of interest were recorded. RESULTS: All patient data with motion exhibited visibly reduced intervolume misalignment after motion correction. Improved flow delineation between different tissues and a more clearly defined ischemic lesion (IL) were achieved in the motion-corrected CBF. A significant difference occurred in the IL (P < 0.05) for patients with severe motion with an average difference between corrupted and corrected data of 4.8 mL/minute/100 g. The phantom data supported the patient results with better CBF accuracy after motion correction and high registration accuracy (<1 mm translational and <1 degrees rotational error). CONCLUSION: Motion degrades flow differentiation between adjacent tissues in CBF maps and can cause ischemic severity to be underestimated. A registration motion correction scheme improves dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MR perfusion estimates. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Ivana Galinovic; Ann-Christin Ostwaldt; Carina Soemmer; Helena Bros; Benjamin Hotter; Peter Brunecker; Jochen B Fiebach Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 1.930