Literature DB >> 17895495

Should family members be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A review of the literature.

C Dana Critchell1, Paul E Marik.   

Abstract

During resuscitation, family members are often escorted out of the room for fear of immediate and long-term consequences to the family, the patient, and the physician. However, mounting evidence suggests that family presence during resuscitation could, in fact, be beneficial. The Emergency Nurses Association and the American Heart Association endorse family-witnessed resuscitation and the development of hospital policies to facilitate this process. However, the opinions on family-witnessed resuscitation vary widely, and few hospitals in the United States have developed formal policies on the presence of families during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In this article, we review the current status of family-witnessed resuscitation and provide recommendations on the development of hospital policies for family-witnessed resuscitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17895495     DOI: 10.1177/1049909107304554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  9 in total

1.  Policies allowing family presence during resuscitation and patterns of care during in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Zachary D Goldberger; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Graham Nichol; Paul S Chan; J Randall Curtis; Colin R Cooke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-03-24

2.  Providing immediate neonatal care and resuscitation at birth beside the mother: clinicians' views, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Charles W Yoxall; Susan Ayers; Alexandra Sawyer; Sophia Bertullies; Margaret Thomas; Andrew D Weeks; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Innovation in immediate neonatal care: development of the Bedside Assessment, Stabilisation and Initial Cardiorespiratory Support (BASICS) trolley.

Authors:  A D Weeks; P Watt; C W Yoxall; A Gallagher; A Burleigh; S Bewley; A M Heuchan; L Duley
Journal:  BMJ Innov       Date:  2015-04

4.  Family presence during resuscitation: attitudes of Yale-New Haven Hospital staff.

Authors:  Zohar Lederman; Oren Wacht
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2014-03-05

5.  Cord pilot trial - immediate versus deferred cord clamping for very preterm birth (before 32 weeks gestation): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Angela Pushpa-Rajah; Lucy Bradshaw; Jon Dorling; Gill Gyte; Eleanor J Mitchell; Jim Thornton; Lelia Duley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Providing immediate neonatal care and resuscitation at birth beside the mother: parents' views, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alexandra Sawyer; Susan Ayers; Sophia Bertullies; Margaret Thomas; Andrew D Weeks; Charles W Yoxall; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Providing newborn resuscitation at the mother's bedside: assessing the safety, usability and acceptability of a mobile trolley.

Authors:  Margaret R Thomas; Charles W Yoxall; Andrew D Weeks; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Randomised trial of cord clamping and initial stabilisation at very preterm birth.

Authors:  Lelia Duley; Jon Dorling; Angela Pushpa-Rajah; Sam J Oddie; Charles William Yoxall; Bernard Schoonakker; Lucy Bradshaw; Eleanor J Mitchell; Joe Anthony Fawke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  Acceptability of Bedside Resuscitation With Intact Umbilical Cord to Clinicians and Patients' Families in the United States.

Authors:  Anup C Katheria; Samuel R Sorkhi; Kasim Hassen; Arij Faksh; Zahra Ghorishi; Debra Poeltler
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.