BACKGROUND: While normal at rest, left ventricular (LV) systolic function may become abnormal during exercise in patients with aortic stenosis. Once contraindicated in patients with aortic stenosis, exercise testing is now recommended in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis to elicit symptoms and thereby ascertain the need for aortic valve replacement. However, the clinical significance of an abnormal LV response to exercise in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of an abnormal LV response during exercise in the setting of aortic stenosis. METHODS: We monitored the LV response to exercise by 2D-Doppler echocardiography during a symptom limited semirecumbent bicycle exercise in 50 patients with tight aortic stenosis (aortic valve area < or = 1.0 cm(2)) and a normal LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction, EF > or = 50%) and followed them for an average of 11 months. RESULTS: Twenty patients had an abnormal LV response to exercise with a mean decrease in LV EF from 64 +/- 10 to 53 +/- 12% while 30 patients had a normal LV response to exercise with a mean increase in LV EF from 62 +/- 7 to 70 +/- 8%. Patients with an abnormal LV response during exercise were more likely to develop symptoms during exercise than patients with a normal LV response: 80% versus 27% (P< 0.0001). The survival free of cardiac events was significantly lower in patients with abnormal LV response to exercise than in patients with a normal response (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Exercise echocardiography provides objective data that facilitate interpretation of exercise elicited symptoms in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. In addition, an abnormal LV response to exercise may predict a poor outcome.
BACKGROUND: While normal at rest, left ventricular (LV) systolic function may become abnormal during exercise in patients with aortic stenosis. Once contraindicated in patients with aortic stenosis, exercise testing is now recommended in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis to elicit symptoms and thereby ascertain the need for aortic valve replacement. However, the clinical significance of an abnormal LV response to exercise in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implications of an abnormal LV response during exercise in the setting of aortic stenosis. METHODS: We monitored the LV response to exercise by 2D-Doppler echocardiography during a symptom limited semirecumbent bicycle exercise in 50 patients with tight aortic stenosis (aortic valve area < or = 1.0 cm(2)) and a normal LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction, EF > or = 50%) and followed them for an average of 11 months. RESULTS: Twenty patients had an abnormal LV response to exercise with a mean decrease in LV EF from 64 +/- 10 to 53 +/- 12% while 30 patients had a normal LV response to exercise with a mean increase in LV EF from 62 +/- 7 to 70 +/- 8%. Patients with an abnormal LV response during exercise were more likely to develop symptoms during exercise than patients with a normal LV response: 80% versus 27% (P< 0.0001). The survival free of cardiac events was significantly lower in patients with abnormal LV response to exercise than in patients with a normal response (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Exercise echocardiography provides objective data that facilitate interpretation of exercise elicited symptoms in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. In addition, an abnormal LV response to exercise may predict a poor outcome.
Authors: Sylvestre Maréchaux; Zeineb Hachicha; Annaïk Bellouin; Jean G Dumesnil; Patrick Meimoun; Agnès Pasquet; Sébastien Bergeron; Marie Arsenault; Thierry Le Tourneau; Pierre Vladimir Ennezat; Philippe Pibarot Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-03-21 Impact factor: 29.983