BACKGROUND: Functional MRI (fMRI) has shown promise as a tool to characterize altered brain function in Alzheimer disease (AD) and for use in proof of concept clinical trials. FMRI studies of subjects with AD have demonstrated altered hippocampal and neocortical activation while encoding novel stimuli compared to older controls. However, the relationship between fMRI activation and performance on standardized clinical trial memory measures has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patterns of activation during an associative-memory fMRI paradigm correlate with performance on memory measures used in AD clinical trials. METHODS: Twenty-nine subjects with AD underwent neuropsychological testing, including the AD Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), and an associative-encoding fMRI paradigm. Scores were entered as regressors in SPM2 analyses of the differential fMRI activation to novel-vs-repeated (NvR) stimuli. To account for cerebral atrophy, native-space structure-function analyses were performed with subjects' high-resolution structural images. RESULTS: Performance on the ADAS-Cog verbal memory component, and the ADAS-Cog total score, correlated with NvR activation in left superior temporal (p = 0.0003; r = -0.51) and left prefrontal (p = 0.00001; r = -0.63) cortices. In a subgroup with more extensive neuropsychological testing (n = 14), performance on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test was correlated with activation in these same regions. fMRI activation remained correlated with performance even when accounting for atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between functional MRI (fMRI) activation and standardized memory measures supports the potential use of fMRI to investigate regional mechanisms of treatment response in clinical trials of novel therapies for Alzheimer disease. .
BACKGROUND: Functional MRI (fMRI) has shown promise as a tool to characterize altered brain function in Alzheimer disease (AD) and for use in proof of concept clinical trials. FMRI studies of subjects with AD have demonstrated altered hippocampal and neocortical activation while encoding novel stimuli compared to older controls. However, the relationship between fMRI activation and performance on standardized clinical trial memory measures has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patterns of activation during an associative-memory fMRI paradigm correlate with performance on memory measures used in AD clinical trials. METHODS: Twenty-nine subjects with AD underwent neuropsychological testing, including the AD Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), and an associative-encoding fMRI paradigm. Scores were entered as regressors in SPM2 analyses of the differential fMRI activation to novel-vs-repeated (NvR) stimuli. To account for cerebral atrophy, native-space structure-function analyses were performed with subjects' high-resolution structural images. RESULTS: Performance on the ADAS-Cog verbal memory component, and the ADAS-Cog total score, correlated with NvR activation in left superior temporal (p = 0.0003; r = -0.51) and left prefrontal (p = 0.00001; r = -0.63) cortices. In a subgroup with more extensive neuropsychological testing (n = 14), performance on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test was correlated with activation in these same regions. fMRI activation remained correlated with performance even when accounting for atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between functional MRI (fMRI) activation and standardized memory measures supports the potential use of fMRI to investigate regional mechanisms of treatment response in clinical trials of novel therapies for Alzheimer disease. .
Authors: Donald G McLaren; Aishwarya Sreenivasan; Eli L Diamond; Meghan B Mitchell; Koene R A Van Dijk; Amy N Deluca; Jacqueline L O'Brien; Dorene M Rentz; Reisa A Sperling; Alireza Atri Journal: Neurodegener Dis Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 2.977
Authors: Alireza Atri; Jacqueline L O'Brien; Aishwarya Sreenivasan; Sarah Rastegar; Sibyl Salisbury; Amy N DeLuca; Kelly M O'Keefe; Peter S LaViolette; Dorene M Rentz; Joseph J Locascio; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2011-05
Authors: Eric D Vidoni; George P Thomas; Robyn A Honea; Natalia Loskutova; Jeffrey M Burns Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Gary W Small; Susan Y Bookheimer; Paul M Thompson; Greg M Cole; S-C Huang; Vladimir Kepe; Jorge R Barrio Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J L Woodard; M Seidenberg; K A Nielson; P Antuono; L Guidotti; S Durgerian; Q Zhang; M Lancaster; N Hantke; A Butts; S M Rao Journal: Brain Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: David B Arciniegas; Jason R Tregellas; Donald C Rojas; Burlleen Hewitt; C Alan Anderson Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Alexandre Bejanin; Armelle Viard; Gaël Chételat; David Clarys; Frédéric Bernard; Alice Pélerin; Vincent de La Sayette; Francis Eustache; Béatrice Desgranges Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Benjamin Becker; Lucas Androsch; Ralph T Jahn; Therese Alich; Nadine Striepens; Sebastian Markett; Wolfgang Maier; René Hurlemann Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.558