Literature DB >> 17893062

Perspectives on body MR imaging at ultrahigh field.

Elizabeth M Hecht1, Ray F Lee, Bachir Taouli, Daniel K Sodickson.   

Abstract

As investigators consider approaching the challenge of MR imaging at field strengths above 3T, do they follow the same paradigm, and continue to work around the same problems they have encountered thus far at 3T, or do they explore other ways of answering the clinical questions more effectively and more comprehensively? The most immediate problems of imaging at ultrahigh field strength are not unfamiliar, as many of them are still pressing issues at 3T: radiofrequency coils, B1 homogeneity, specific absorption rate, safety, B0 field homogeneity, alterations in tissue contrast, and chemical shift. In this article, these issues are briefly reviewed in terms of how they may affect image quality at field strengths beyond 3T. The authors propose various approaches to overcoming the challenges, and discuss potential applications of ultrahigh field MR imaging as it applies to specific abdominal, pelvic, peripheral vascular, and breast imaging protocols.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17893062     DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1064-9689            Impact factor:   2.266


  7 in total

1.  Cardiac chamber quantification using magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla--a pilot study.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Tobias Frauenrath; Marcel Prothmann; Matthias A Dieringer; Fabian Hezel; Wolfgang Renz; Kerstin Kretschel; Thoralf Niendorf; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Reni S Butler; Christine Chen; Reena Vashi; Regina J Hooley; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28

3.  Bilateral hip imaging at 7 Tesla using a multi-channel transmit technology: initial results presenting anatomical detail in healthy volunteers and pathological changes in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  J M Theysohn; O Kraff; S Orzada; N Theysohn; T Classen; S Landgraeber; M E Ladd; T C Lauenstein
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Current and future trends in magnetic resonance imaging assessments of the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Mia Levy; David Smith; E Brian Welch; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.375

5.  Hip imaging of avascular necrosis at 7 Tesla compared with 3 Tesla.

Authors:  J M Theysohn; O Kraff; N Theysohn; S Orzada; S Landgraeber; M E Ladd; T C Lauenstein
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  3T MRI induced post-traumatic stress disorder: a case report.

Authors:  Shaheen E Lakhan
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2012-10-10

7.  Evolution of cardiac and renal impairment detected by high-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance in mice with renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Behzad Ebrahimi; John A Crane; Bruce E Knudsen; Slobodan I Macura; Joseph P Grande; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.