PURPOSE: Current methods for measuring long-term endogenous production of cortisol can be challenging due to the need to take multiple urine, saliva or serum samples. Hair grows approximately 1 centimeter per month, and hair analysis accurately reflects exposure to drug abuse and environmental toxins. Here we describe a new assay for measurement of cortisol in hair, and determined a reference range for non-obese subjects. METHODS: For measurement of cortisol in hair we modified an immunoassay originally developed for measuring cortisol in saliva. We compared hair samples obtained from various parts of the head, and assessed the effect of hair dying. We analyzed hair samples from non-obese subjects, in whom we also obtained urine, saliva and blood samples for cortisol measurements. RESULTS: The mean extraction recovery for hair cortisol standards of 100 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml (n=6) was 87.9%, 88.9% and 87.4%, respectively. Hair cortisol levels were not affected by hair color or by dying hair samples after they were obtained. Cortisol levels were decreased in hair that was artificially colored before taking the sample. The coefficient of variation was high for cortisol levels in hair from different sections of the head (30.5 %), but was smaller when comparing between hair samples obtained from the vertex posterior (15.6%). The reference range for cortisol in hair was 17.7-153.2 pg/mg of hair (median 46.1 pg/mg). Hair cortisol levels correlated significantly with cortisol in 24-hour urine (r=0.33; P=0.041). CONCLUSION: The correlation of hair cortisol with 24-hour urine cortisol supports its relevance as biomarker for long-term exposure.
PURPOSE: Current methods for measuring long-term endogenous production of cortisol can be challenging due to the need to take multiple urine, saliva or serum samples. Hair grows approximately 1 centimeter per month, and hair analysis accurately reflects exposure to drug abuse and environmental toxins. Here we describe a new assay for measurement of cortisol in hair, and determined a reference range for non-obese subjects. METHODS: For measurement of cortisol in hair we modified an immunoassay originally developed for measuring cortisol in saliva. We compared hair samples obtained from various parts of the head, and assessed the effect of hair dying. We analyzed hair samples from non-obese subjects, in whom we also obtained urine, saliva and blood samples for cortisol measurements. RESULTS: The mean extraction recovery for hair cortisol standards of 100 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml (n=6) was 87.9%, 88.9% and 87.4%, respectively. Hair cortisol levels were not affected by hair color or by dying hair samples after they were obtained. Cortisol levels were decreased in hair that was artificially colored before taking the sample. The coefficient of variation was high for cortisol levels in hair from different sections of the head (30.5 %), but was smaller when comparing between hair samples obtained from the vertex posterior (15.6%). The reference range for cortisol in hair was 17.7-153.2 pg/mg of hair (median 46.1 pg/mg). Hair cortisol levels correlated significantly with cortisol in 24-hour urine (r=0.33; P=0.041). CONCLUSION: The correlation of hair cortisol with 24-hour urine cortisol supports its relevance as biomarker for long-term exposure.
Authors: Nicolaas H Fourie; Trudy R Turner; Janine L Brown; James D Pampush; Joseph G Lorenz; Robin M Bernstein Journal: Primates Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 2.163
Authors: Amanda F Hamel; Jerrold S Meyer; Elizabeth Henchey; Amanda M Dettmer; Stephen J Suomi; Melinda A Novak Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: M Camille Hoffman; Laura V Karban; Patrick Benitez; Angela Goodteacher; Mark L Laudenslager Journal: Clin Invest Med Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 0.825
Authors: Leah H Somerville; Susan Y Bookheimer; Randy L Buckner; Gregory C Burgess; Sandra W Curtiss; Mirella Dapretto; Jennifer Stine Elam; Michael S Gaffrey; Michael P Harms; Cynthia Hodge; Sridhar Kandala; Erik K Kastman; Thomas E Nichols; Bradley L Schlaggar; Stephen M Smith; Kathleen M Thomas; Essa Yacoub; David C Van Essen; Deanna M Barch Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: S Thomson; G Koren; L-A Fraser; M Rieder; T C Friedman; S H M Van Uum Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 2.949