Literature DB >> 17892457

Magnifying lenses assisted nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and prevention of nerve plexus trauma.

G Mantzaris1, A Rodolakis, G Vlachos, S Athanasiou, S Theocharis, Ch M Sotiripoulou, A Antsaklis.   

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to present a new approach for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) with the assistance of magnifying lenses and to describe the differences in autonomic nerve plexus trauma between NSRH type III and conventional radical hysterectomy (RH) types II and III with the aid of immunohistochemistry. Eighteen women with FIGO stage IB(1)-IB(2) cervical cancer underwent loupes-assisted NSRH (n = 8), RH type II (n = 6), and RH type III (n = 4). Biopsies were taken intraoperatively from uterosacral ligament (USL) and cardinal ligament (CL), as well as from anterior vaginal wall (AVW) and posterior vaginal wall (PVW). Immunohistochemistry was approached with the use of S-100 protein, a general nerve marker. The percentage area of immunoreactivity (PAI) was used as an objective quantitative measure of nerve fibers within the ligaments. The PAI was greater in RH-III biopsies from both USL and CL (P < 0.001) when compared with RH-II and NSRH biopsies. For AVW and PVW, PAI differences were not statistically significant (AVW, P = 0.119; PVW, P = 0.067). Uterine-supporting ligaments represent a major pathway for autonomic nerves to the pelvic organs. As significantly more autonomic nerves are transected during the division of the uterine-supporting ligaments in RH type III, a more careful approach in the dissection of the ligaments through nerve-preserving techniques seems to be necessary in order to prevent iatrogenic intraoperative injury of the pelvic plexus and reduce or prevent postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17892457     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01071.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

2.  Anatomical basis of female pelvic cavity for nerve sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Haili Li; Jianxin Jia; Yanlai Xiao; Lin Kang; Huixian Cui
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The 3D reconstructions of female pelvic autonomic nerves and their related organs based on MRI: a first step towards neuronavigation during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Ping Liu; Chunlin Chen; Hui Duan; Wenjun Qiao; Oldevie Hugueth Ognami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Refinement on surgical technique: role of magnification.

Authors:  I A Mungadi
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2010-01

Review 6.  Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Long; De-Sheng Yao; Xin-Wei Pan; Ting-Yu Ou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of using magnifying loupe glasses on lymphocele formation and surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Fatih Akkuş; Serhan Can İşcan; Jalal Raoufi; Mehmet Güney; Evrim Erdemoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.