Literature DB >> 17892374

Effects of intravenous zoledronic acid once yearly on bone remodeling and bone structure.

Robert R Recker1, Pierre D Delmas, Johan Halse, Ian R Reid, Steven Boonen, Pedro A García-Hernandez, Jerzy Supronik, E Michael Lewiecki, Luis Ochoa, Paul Miller, Huilin Hu, Peter Mesenbrink, Florian Hartl, Juerg Gasser, Erik F Eriksen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In a substudy of the HORIZON pivotal fracture trial, in which yearly intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg was found to significantly reduce risk of various fracture types in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, 152 patients underwent bone biopsy. Zoledronic acid reduced bone turnover by 63% and preserved bone structure and volume, with evidence of ongoing bone remodeling in 99% of biopsies obtained.
INTRODUCTION: In the HORIZON pivotal fracture trial (PFT), enrolling 7,736 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, three annual intravenous infusions of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (5 mg) significantly reduced morphometric vertebral, clinical vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures by 70%, 77%, 41%, and 25%, respectively. Whereas 79% of patients received zoledronic acid/placebo only (stratum I, n = 6,113), 21% received concomitant treatment with other antiresorptive drugs, excluding other bisphosphonates, PTH, and strontium (stratum II, n = 1,652).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine effects on bone remodeling and bone architecture, iliac crest bone biopsies were obtained in 152 patients on active treatment or placebo at 3 yr after double tetracycline labeling. In five patients, only qualitative histology was performed, leaving 147 biopsy cores (79 on active treatment and 68 on placebo) for microCT analysis and histomorphometry.
RESULTS: Analysis of bone structure by microCT revealed higher trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) in the zoledronic acid group (median, 16.6% versus 12.8%; p = 0.020). In addition, patients treated with zoledronic acid exhibited higher trabecular numbers (p = 0.008), decreased trabecular separation (p = 0.011), and a trend toward improvement in connectivity density (p = 0.062), all indicating better preservation of trabecular structure after treatment with zoledronic acid. Qualitative analysis revealed presence of tetracycline label in 81 of 82 biopsies from patients on zoledronic acid and all 70 biopsies from placebo patients, indicative of continued bone remodeling. No bone pathology was observed. Zoledronic acid induced a 63% median (71% mean) reduction of the activation frequency (Ac.f; p < 0.0001) and reduced mineralizing surface (MS/BS; p < 0.0001) and volume referent bone formation rate (BFR/BV) versus placebo, indicating reduced bone turnover. Mineral appositional rate was higher in the zoledronic acid group (p = 0.0002), suggesting improved osteoblast function compared with placebo. Mineralization lag time was similar in the two groups, whereas osteoid volume (OV/BV; p < 0.0001) and osteoid thickness (O.Th; p = 0.0094) were lower in zoledronic acid-treated patients, indicating normal osteoid formation and mineralization of newly formed bone. Concomitant administration of other antiresorptive osteoporosis therapies (e.g., raloxifene, tamoxifen, tibolone, ipriflavone) did not significantly alter the tissue level response to zoledronic acid.
CONCLUSIONS: Annual dosing for 3 yr with zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously resulted in a median 63% (mean, 71%) reduction of bone turnover and preservation of bone structure and mass without any signs of adynamic bone. Concomitant treatment with other osteoporosis therapies did not significantly affect the bone response to zoledronic acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17892374     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.070906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  67 in total

1.  Osteomalacia: the missing link in the pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws?

Authors:  Alberto Bedogni; Giorgia Saia; Giordana Bettini; Anita Tronchet; Andrea Totola; Giorgio Bedogni; Paolo Tregnago; Maria Teresa Valenti; Francesco Bertoldo; Giuseppe Ferronato; Pier Francesco Nocini; Stella Blandamura; Luca Dalle Carbonare
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-06-20

Review 2.  Novel actions of bisphosphonates in bone: preservation of osteoblast and osteocyte viability.

Authors:  Teresita Bellido; Lilian I Plotkin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Potential effects of bisphosphonates on bone ultrastructure.

Authors:  C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Histomorphometric interpretation of bone biopsies for the evaluation of osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Juliet E Compston
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2012-04-04

Review 5.  Issues in modern bone histomorphometry.

Authors:  R R Recker; D B Kimmel; D Dempster; R S Weinstein; T J Wronski; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Bisphosphonates hinder osteoblastic/osteoclastic differentiation in the maxillary sinus mucosa-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Jaesuh Park; Jung-Woo Lee; Yong-Dae Kwon; Eun-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: treatment update and review.

Authors:  Lisa-Ann Fraser; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.346

8.  Effects of 3 years treatment with once-yearly zoledronic acid on the kinetics of bone matrix maturation in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  S Gamsjaeger; B Hofstetter; E Zwettler; R Recker; J A Gasser; E F Eriksen; K Klaushofer; E P Paschalis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Updates in CKD-Associated Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Pascale Khairallah; Thomas L Nickolas
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Skeletal effects of zoledronic acid in an animal model of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  M R Allen; N X Chen; V H Gattone; X Chen; A J Carr; P LeBlanc; D Brown; S M Moe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.