Literature DB >> 17891498

Activity-based costing evaluation of [18F]-fludeoxyglucose production.

Bruno Krug1, Annie Van Zanten, Anne-Sophie Pirson, Ralph Crott, Thierry Vander Borght.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As healthcare expenses are escalating in many countries, the sector faces a new challenge of becoming more cost efficient. There is an urgent need for more accurate data on the costs of healthcare procedures. The cost of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with [(18)F]-fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) studies is mainly influenced by the price of the radiopharmaceutical, which may vary throughout Europe from 300 to 500 Euro per patient dose (370 MBq). The aim of the current study is to conduct an activity-based costing (ABC) estimation of (18)F-FDG production in Europe to better identify the different cost components and to analyse their relative contribution to the total cost.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Financial data were collected on capital expense and global operating costs through interviews with industry experts, PET centre managers, evaluation of prior studies, and review of expenses incurred at the University Medical Centre in Groningen (The Netherlands). After mapping the activities, we divided the cost in five categories: wage, equipment, consumables, overhead and space costs. A sensitivity analysis was performed for key cost components, including the compliance with regulatory requirements.
RESULTS: The critical factor for profitability was throughput. Including the European regulation procedure, the cost for 370 MBq (18)F-FDG patient dose, 3 h EOS without delivery cost, ranges between 155 and 177 Euro/dose for two production runs and between 210 and 237 Euro/dose for one production run. These costs are predominantly determined by personnel and equipment costs, although the cost for quality assurance increases steadily.
CONCLUSION: The ABC analysis provides significant insight into the production cost components of (18)F-FDG through different operating configurations. Reductions in equipment prices, increased availability of radiopharmaceuticals, growth in demand, and improvements in reimbursement will all contribute to the financial viability of this imaging technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17891498     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0551-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  22 in total

1.  Activity-based costing in radiology. Application in a pediatric radiological unit.

Authors:  J Laurila; I Suramo; M Brommels; E M Tolppanen; P Koivukangas; P Lanning; G Standertskjöld-Nordenstam
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Activity-based cost analysis: a method of analyzing the financial and operating performance of academic radiology departments.

Authors:  M D Cohen; D R Hawes; G D Hutchins; W D McPhee; M B LaMasters; R P Fallon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis: can we reduce variability in costing methods?

Authors:  Taghreed Adam; Marc A Koopmanschap; David B Evans
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  The cost of an upper gastroduodenal endoscopy: an activity-based approach.

Authors:  Ralph Crott; Nicholaos Makris; Alan Barkun; Carlo Fallone
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  The cost of a hospital ward in Europe: is there a methodology available to accurately measure the costs?

Authors:  D Negrini; A Kettle; L Sheppard; G H Mills; D L Edbrooke
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2004

6.  Activity-based costing for hospitals.

Authors:  R H Ramsey
Journal:  Hosp Health Serv Adm       Date:  1994

7.  The utilization of activity-based cost accounting in hospitals.

Authors:  Dennis Emmett; Robert Forget
Journal:  J Hosp Mark Public Relations       Date:  2005

8.  The importance of activity-based methods in radiology and the technology that now makes this possible.

Authors:  Paul Monge
Journal:  Radiol Manage       Date:  2006 May-Jun

Review 9.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET.

Authors:  Norbert E Avril; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  3 in total

1.  On the significance of defective block detectors in clinical (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Esmat Elhami; Maryam Samiee; Sandor Demeter; William D Leslie; Andrew L Goertzen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Design and optimization of coin-shaped microreactor chips for PET radiopharmaceutical synthesis.

Authors:  Arkadij M Elizarov; R Michael van Dam; Young Shik Shin; Hartmuth C Kolb; Henry C Padgett; David Stout; Jenny Shu; Jiang Huang; Antoine Daridon; James R Heath
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: a way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?

Authors:  Astrid Langer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.