Literature DB >> 17890735

The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.

Víctor Soria-Carrasco1, Gerard Talavera, Javier Igea, Jose Castresana.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: We introduce a new phylogenetic comparison method that measures overall differences in the relative branch length and topology of two phylogenetic trees. To do this, the algorithm first scales one of the trees to have a global divergence as similar as possible to the other tree. Then, the branch length distance, which takes differences in topology and branch lengths into account, is applied to the two trees. We thus obtain the minimum branch length distance or K tree score. Two trees with very different relative branch lengths get a high K score whereas two trees that follow a similar among-lineage rate variation get a low score, regardless of the overall rates in both trees. There are several applications of the K tree score, two of which are explained here in more detail. First, this score allows the evaluation of the performance of phylogenetic algorithms, not only with respect to their topological accuracy, but also with respect to the reproduction of a given branch length variation. In a second example, we show how the K score allows the selection of orthologous genes by choosing those that better follow the overall shape of a given reference tree. AVAILABILITY: http://molevol.ibmb.csic.es/Ktreedist.html

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17890735     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  39 in total

1.  What is the phylogenetic signal limit from mitogenomes? The reconciliation between mitochondrial and nuclear data in the Insecta class phylogeny.

Authors:  Gerard Talavera; Roger Vila
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Genome-wide comparative analysis of phylogenetic trees: the prokaryotic forest of life.

Authors:  Pere Puigbò; Yuri I Wolf; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

3.  Characterization of phylogenetic networks with NetTest.

Authors:  Miguel Arenas; Mateus Patricio; David Posada; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Morphometric relationship, phylogenetic correlation, and character evolution in the species-rich genus Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae).

Authors:  Hyojoong Kim; Wonhoon Lee; Seunghwan Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Parallel evolution between aromatase and androgen receptor in the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Basant Tiwary; Besant K Tiwary; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Origin of Chemical Diversity in Prochloron-Tunicate Symbiosis.

Authors:  Zhenjian Lin; Joshua P Torres; M Diarey Tianero; Jason C Kwan; Eric W Schmidt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  DNA Barcodes Combined with Multilocus Data of Representative Taxa Can Generate Reliable Higher-Level Phylogenies.

Authors:  Gerard Talavera; Vladimir Lukhtanov; Naomi E Pierce; Roger Vila
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  An ancient history of gene duplications, fusions and losses in the evolution of APOBEC3 mutators in mammals.

Authors:  Carsten Münk; Anouk Willemsen; Ignacio G Bravo
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Interplay of Various Evolutionary Modes in Genome Diversification and Adaptive Evolution of the Family Sulfolobaceae.

Authors:  Rachana Banerjee; Narendrakumar M Chaudhari; Abhishake Lahiri; Anupam Gautam; Debaleena Bhowmik; Chitra Dutta; Sujay Chattopadhyay; Daniel H Huson; Sandip Paul
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Emergence and phylodynamics of Citrus tristeza virus in Sicily, Italy.

Authors:  Salvatore Davino; Anouk Willemsen; Stefano Panno; Mario Davino; Antonino Catara; Santiago F Elena; Luis Rubio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.