Literature DB >> 17889701

Framework for metals risk assessment.

Anne Fairbrother1, Randall Wenstel, Keith Sappington, William Wood.   

Abstract

EPA recognized that metals present unique risk assessment issues, and saw the need to develop a framework document that puts forth key scientific principles for metals risk assessments to help ensure consistency in metals assessments across EPA programs and regional offices. This framework, called the "Framework for Metals Risk Assessment," is a science-based document that describes basic principles that address the special attributes and behaviors of metals and metal compounds to be considered when assessing their human health and ecological risks. The Risk Assessment Forum oversaw the development of this document, including input from stakeholders and experts throughout the Agency, and obtained through several expert workshops, followed by peer review by the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB). The Framework for Metals Risk Assessment document is intended to serve as a guide for all EPA programs and regional offices to supplement or update the policies, practices and guidance they currently use in their respective metals assessments. This framework document is not a prescriptive guide on how any particular type of assessment should be conducted within an EPA program office. Rather, it outlines key metal principles and describes how they should be considered in conducting human health and ecological risk assessments to advance our understanding of metals impact and foster consistency across EPA programs and regions. Although the audience for the framework is primarily intended to be Agency risk assessors, it also will communicate principles and recommendations for metals risk assessment to stakeholders and the public. This framework will be used in conjunction with guidance developed by the programs and regions for site-specific risk assessment, criteria derivation, ranking or categorization and other similar Agency activities related to metals. The Framework for Metals Risk Assessment document is intended to serve as a guide for all EPA programs and regional offices to supplement or update the policies, practices and guidance they currently use in their respective metals assessments. EPA assessments can vary in level of detail from simple, screening analyses to complex, definitive assessments. More complex scientific tools and metal specific methods should be applied as the complexity of the hazard assessment or risk assessment increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17889701     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  39 in total

1.  Arsenic aggravated reproductive toxicity in male rats exposed to lead during the perinatal period.

Authors:  A K Sai Siva Ram; K Pratap Reddy; B P Girish; Ch Supriya; P Sreenivasula Reddy
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Diversity of integron- and culture-associated antibiotic resistance genes in freshwater floc.

Authors:  Christopher N Drudge; Amy V C Elliott; Janina M Plach; Linda J Ejim; Gerard D Wright; Ian G Droppo; Lesley A Warren
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  How contamination sources and soil properties can influence the Cd and Pb bioavailability to snails.

Authors:  Benjamin Pauget; Frédéric Gimbert; Mickael Coeurdassier; Coline Druart; Nadia Crini; Annette de Vaufleury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Comprehensive analysis of an ecological risk assessment of the Daliao River estuary, China.

Authors:  Ge Yu; Jing Chen; Xueqing Zhang; Zhengyan Li
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Assessing the ecotoxicological effects of long-term contaminated mine soils on plants and earthworms: relevance of soil (total and available) and body concentrations.

Authors:  Concepción García-Gómez; Elvira Esteban; Beatriz Sánchez-Pardo; María Dolores Fernández
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Effect of cadmium accumulation on mineral nutrient levels in vegetable crops: potential implications for human health.

Authors:  Danping Yang; Zhiqiang Guo; Iain D Green; Deti Xie
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Importance of background values in assessing the impact of heavy metals in river ecosystems: case study of Tisza River, Serbia.

Authors:  Snežana Štrbac; Milica Kašanin Grubin; Nebojša Vasić
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Contamination impact and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in surface soils from selected major mining areas in Ghana.

Authors:  George Yaw Hadzi; Godwin A Ayoko; David K Essumang; Shiloh K D Osae
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.609

9.  Acute toxicity of copper, lead, cadmium, and zinc to early life stages of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) in laboratory and Columbia River water.

Authors:  David W Vardy; Robert Santore; Adam Ryan; John P Giesy; Markus Hecker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Investigations of responses to metal pollution in land snail populations (Cantareus aspersus and Cepaea nemoralis) from a smelter-impacted area.

Authors:  Clémentine Fritsch; Michaël Coeurdassier; Frédéric Gimbert; Nadia Crini; Renaud Scheifler; Annette de Vaufleury
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.