Literature DB >> 17889263

Haplotype-based analysis of genes associated with risk of adverse skin reactions after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Tomo Suga1, Atsuko Ishikawa, Masakazu Kohda, Yoshimi Otsuka, Shigeru Yamada, Naohito Yamamoto, Yuta Shibamoto, Yoshihiro Ogawa, Kuninori Nomura, Keizen Sho, Motoko Omura, Kenji Sekiguchi, Yuzo Kikuchi, Yuichi Michikawa, Shuhei Noda, Masashi Sagara, Jun Ohashi, Shinji Yoshinaga, Junetsu Mizoe, Hirohiko Tsujii, Mayumi Iwakawa, Takashi Imai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify haplotypes of single nucleotide polymorphism markers associated with the risk of early adverse skin reactions (EASRs) after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DNA was sampled from 399 Japanese breast cancer patients who qualified for breast-conserving radiotherapy. Using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria scoring system, version 2, the patients were grouped according to EASRs, defined as those occurring within 3 months of starting radiotherapy (Grade 1 or less, n = 290; Grade 2 or greater, n = 109). A total of 999 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 137 candidate genes for radiation susceptibility were genotyped, and the haplotype associations between groups were assessed.
RESULTS: The global haplotype association analysis (p < 0.05 and false discovery rate < 0.05) indicated that estimated haplotypes in six loci were associated with EASR risk. A comparison of the risk haplotype with the most frequent haplotype in each locus showed haplotype GGTT in CD44 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.43) resulted in a significantly greater EASR risk. Five haplotypes, CG in MAD2L2 (OR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.87), GTTG in PTTG1 (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96), TCC (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.89) and CCG (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.92) in RAD9A, and GCT in LIG3 (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.93) were associated with a reduced EASR risk. No significant risk haplotype was observed in REV3L.
CONCLUSION: Individual radiosensitivity can be partly determined by these haplotypes in multiple loci. Our findings may lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the genetic variation in radiation sensitivity and resistance among breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17889263     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Association between SNPs in defined functional pathways and risk of early or late toxicity as well as individual radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Sebastian Reuther; Silke Szymczak; Annette Raabe; Kerstin Borgmann; Andreas Ziegler; Cordula Petersen; Ekkehard Dikomey; Ulrike Hoeller
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Germline polymorphisms in genes involved in the CD44 signaling pathway are associated with clinical outcome in localized gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Winder; Yan Ning; Dongyun Yang; Wu Zhang; Derek G Power; Pierre Bohanes; Armin Gerger; Peter M Wilson; Georg Lurje; Laura H Tang; Manish Shah; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Identification of SNPs associated with susceptibility for development of adverse reactions to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Donghui Li; Hideo Suzuki; Bingrong Liu; Jeffrey Morris; Jun Liu; Taro Okazaki; Yanan Li; Ping Chang; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Genome wide screen identifies microsatellite markers associated with acute adverse effects following radiotherapy in cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuichi Michikawa; Tomo Suga; Atsuko Ishikawa; Hideki Hayashi; Akira Oka; Hidetoshi Inoko; Mayumi Iwakawa; Takashi Imai
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.103

Review 6.  Individual response of humans to ionising radiation: governing factors and importance for radiological protection.

Authors:  K E Applegate; W Rühm; A Wojcik; M Bourguignon; A Brenner; K Hamasaki; T Imai; M Imaizumi; T Imaoka; S Kakinuma; T Kamada; N Nishimura; N Okonogi; K Ozasa; C E Rübe; A Sadakane; R Sakata; Y Shimada; K Yoshida; S Bouffler
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes ATM, GSTP1, SOD2, TGFB1, XPD and XRCC1 with risk of severe erythema after breast conserving radiotherapy.

Authors:  Annette Raabe; Katharina Derda; Sebastian Reuther; Silke Szymczak; Kerstin Borgmann; Ulrike Hoeller; Andreas Ziegler; Cordula Petersen; Ekkehard Dikomey
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Visible Genotype Sensor Array.

Authors:  Yuichi Michikawa; Tomo Suga; Yoshimi Ohtsuka; Izumi Matsumoto; Atsuko Ishikawa; Kenichi Ishikawa; Mayumi Iwakawa; Takashi Imai
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Genetics and genomics of radiotherapy toxicity: towards prediction.

Authors:  Catharine M West; Gillian C Barnett
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Significant Association Between XRCC1 Expression and Its rs25487 Polymorphism and Radiotherapy-Related Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  Li Gong; Ming Luo; Renhuang Sun; Li Qiu; Chunli Chen; Zhiguo Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.