Literature DB >> 17889040

Experimental remission of unilateral spatial neglect.

Sylvie Chokron1, Eve Dupierrix, Matthias Tabert, Paolo Bartolomeo.   

Abstract

Over the past several decades a growing amount of research has focused on the possibility of transiently reducing left neglect signs in right brain-damaged patients by using vestibular and/or visuo-proprioceptive stimulations. Here we review seminal papers dealing with these visuo-vestibulo-proprioceptive stimulations in normal controls, right brain-damaged (RBD) patients, and animals. We discuss these data in terms of clinical implications but also with regards to theoretical frameworks commonly used to explain the unilateral neglect syndrome. We undermine the effect of these stimulations on the position of the egocentric reference and extend the notion that the positive effects of these stimulation techniques may stem from a reorientation of attention towards the neglected side of space or from a recalibration of sensori-motor correlations. We conclude this review with discussing the possible interaction between experimental rehabilitation, models of neglect and basic spatial cognition research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17889040     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Effector-dependent neglect and splenial disconnection: a spherical deconvolution tractography study.

Authors:  Marine Lunven; Michel Thiebaut De Schotten; Bertrand Glize; Raffaella Migliaccio; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois; François Cotton; Paolo Bartolomeo; Gilles Rode
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Paola Fortis; Kelly M Goedert; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Long lasting egocentric disorientation induced by normal sensori-motor spatial interaction.

Authors:  Eve Dupierrix; Michael Gresty; Théophile Ohlmann; Sylvie Chokron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visuo-haptic interactions in unilateral spatial neglect: the cross modal judd illusion.

Authors:  Flavia Mancini; Emanuela Bricolo; Flavia C Mattioli; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-22

6.  Effects of body awareness training on mild visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dae-Hyouk Bang; Hyun-Jeong Noh; Hyuk-Shin Cho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-04-30

7.  Now You Feel both: Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Induces Lasting Improvements in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Tactile Extinction.

Authors:  Lena Schmidt; Kathrin S Utz; Lena Depper; Michaela Adams; Anna-Katharina Schaadt; Stefan Reinhart; Georg Kerkhoff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effects on neglect: a visual-evoked potential study.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Donatella Spinelli; Giuseppe Vallar; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Impact of Cerebral Visual Impairments on Motor Skills: Implications for Developmental Coordination Disorders.

Authors:  Sylvie Chokron; Gordon N Dutton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-04

10.  Trunk rotation and handedness modulate cortical activation in neglect-associated regions during temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Kerstin Paschke; Mathias Bähr; Torsten Wüstenberg; Melanie Wilke
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.