BACKGROUND: Although QRS-complex changes during ischemia have been described previously, their relation with no-reflow is not clear. PURPOSE: To evaluate relation of admission QRS duration with angiographic no-reflow, we studied 162 patients who underwent primary angioplasty. METHODS: Twelve-lead electrocardiogram with a paper speed of 50 mm/s was recorded on admission and repeated after angioplasty. Patients were divided into reflow and no-reflow groups based on postangioplasty coronary thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade. RESULTS: Patients in the no-reflow group (26 patients) were older (P = .001) and had significantly longer pain-to-balloon interval (P = .007). The patients in the no-reflow group had significantly longer QRS duration on admission electrocardiogram compared with patients in the reflow group (interquartile range, 80-93 [median, 84] milliseconds vs 60-80 [median, 76] milliseconds, respectively; P < .001). After adjusting all variables, QRS duration on admission was found to be independently related to angiographic no-reflow (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.12; P = .003). CONCLUSION: QRS duration on admission may be valuable in predicting no-reflow.
BACKGROUND: Although QRS-complex changes during ischemia have been described previously, their relation with no-reflow is not clear. PURPOSE: To evaluate relation of admission QRS duration with angiographic no-reflow, we studied 162 patients who underwent primary angioplasty. METHODS: Twelve-lead electrocardiogram with a paper speed of 50 mm/s was recorded on admission and repeated after angioplasty. Patients were divided into reflow and no-reflow groups based on postangioplasty coronary thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade. RESULTS:Patients in the no-reflow group (26 patients) were older (P = .001) and had significantly longer pain-to-balloon interval (P = .007). The patients in the no-reflow group had significantly longer QRS duration on admission electrocardiogram compared with patients in the reflow group (interquartile range, 80-93 [median, 84] milliseconds vs 60-80 [median, 76] milliseconds, respectively; P < .001). After adjusting all variables, QRS duration on admission was found to be independently related to angiographic no-reflow (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.12; P = .003). CONCLUSION: QRS duration on admission may be valuable in predicting no-reflow.