Literature DB >> 17888770

Improving mammographic interpretation: double reading and computer-aided diagnosis.

Mark Helvie1.   

Abstract

This article discusses two commonly used techniques advocated to improve screening mammography performance: double reading (DR) and computer-aided detection (CAD). Analysis of these methods is incomplete because no randomized controlled trials have been performed to assess changes in survival. Although DR and CAD have shown improvement in sensitivity, specificity often has decreased. Balancing which parameter is more important involves health care policy, costs, cultural factors, legal risk, and patient preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17888770     DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  7 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chuan Zhou; Yi-Ta Wu; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.

Authors:  Katja Kemp Jacobsen; Ellen S O'Meara; Dustin Key; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Ilse Vejborg; Brian L Sprague; Elsebeth Lynge; My von Euler-Chelpin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review.

Authors:  Edward Azavedo; Sophia Zackrisson; Ingegerd Mejàre; Marianne Heibert Arnlind
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Credentialing for radiology.

Authors:  M Street; Kr Thomson
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2008-01-01

5.  Computer-aided assessment of diagnostic images for epidemiological research.

Authors:  Alison G Abraham; Donald D Duncan; Stephen J Gange; Sheila West
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Collective intelligence meets medical decision-making: the collective outperforms the best radiologist.

Authors:  Max Wolf; Jens Krause; Patricia A Carney; Andy Bogart; Ralf H J M Kurvers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expertise Affects Inter-Observer Agreement at Peripheral Locations within a Brain Tumor.

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; William Alderson; Jonathan Rossiter; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.