Literature DB >> 17888766

BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.

Carl J D'Orsi1, Mary S Newell.   

Abstract

The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is the product of the initial collaboration between various committees of the ACR and several other organizations, such as the American College of American Pathologists and the American College of Surgeons. The impetus to establish a standardized method of reporting and follow-up began as early as 1985 when several of our clinical colleagues made a plea to the ACR to improve the reporting of mammograms. Reports were ambiguous and difficult to interpret, often leaving the clinician without a clear-cut management scenario. Over the years of increasing BI-RADS usage, the BI-RADS committee of the ACR received questions which, when analyzed, focused on specific areas of BI-RADS. A review of these problematic areas, with appropriate guidance, will be presented along with an introduction to the new US and MR imaging lexicons focusing on unique descriptors.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17888766     DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  8 in total

1.  An Effective Way to Solve Equivocal Mammography Findings: The Rolled Views.

Authors:  Emel Alimoglu; Kagan Ceken; Adnan Kabaalioglu; Enrico Cassano; Timur Sindel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Predicting visual semantic descriptive terms from radiological image data: preliminary results with liver lesions in CT.

Authors:  Adrien Depeursinge; Camille Kurtz; Christopher Beaulieu; Sandy Napel; Daniel Rubin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Evaluation of the PI-RADS scoring system for mpMRI of the prostate: a whole-mount step-section analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Michael Quentin; Udo Nagele; Michael Edlinger; Jonathan Richenberg; Georg Schaefer; Michael Ladurner; Werner Jaschke; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results.

Authors:  Hendrik J Teertstra; Claudette E Loo; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Harm van Tinteren; Emiel J T Rutgers; Sara H Muller; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Developing a comprehensive database management system for organization and evaluation of mammography datasets.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Daniel L Rubin; Ryan W Woods; Mai Elezaby; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-10-16

7.  Performance of double reading mammography in an Iranian population and its effect on patient outcome.

Authors:  Maryam Moradi; Kobra Ganji; Niloufar Teyfouri; Farzaneh Kolahdoozan
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 0.212

8.  The Longitudinal Imaging Tracker (BrICS-LIT):A Cloud Platform for Monitoring Treatment Response in Glioblastoma Patients.

Authors:  Karthik Ramesh; Saumya S Gurbani; Eric A Mellon; Vicki Huang; Mohammed Goryawala; Peter B Barker; Lawrence Kleinberg; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; Brent D Weinberg
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.