Literature DB >> 17888552

Deriving a risk-adjustment formula for hospital financing: integrating the impact of socio-economic status on length of stay.

Julian Perelman1, Amir Shmueli, Marie-Christine Closon.   

Abstract

The imperfect risk adjustment of prospective payment for hospitals may have dramatic consequences on equity. If the hospital is able to distinguish subgroups of patients with different expected costs within a group for which the risk-adjusted payment per admission is the same, it is likely to select the most profitable cases and deny care to the others. Meanwhile, hospitals refusing to practice patients' selection may experience solvency problems. In the long term, either those hospitals fail and access to care is at risk, or they decrease the quality of treatments and access to quality is at risk. In Belgium, since 1995, a prospective payment per case has replaced the traditional per diem payments for non-medical expenditures. A fixed number of days are paid to each admission, based on the patient's characteristics, namely diagnosis, age and geriatric profile. In this paper, we examine the imperfect risk adjustment related to the non-inclusion of socio-economic factors in the hospital financing formula. Using data from 61 Belgian hospitals from 1995, we observe that socio-economic status, which is currently not accounted for as risk adjuster, has a significant impact on length of stay (LOS). We estimate that patients in the upper-income categories, patients with a self-employed status and patients with an employee status are beneficial for hospitals' financial results, due to their shorter stays. On the contrary, the non-active, the low-income patients and patients benefiting from an insurance preferential regime represent, on average, a financial loss for hospitals. Finally, we find that financial results under the current financing scheme are biased due to the non-inclusion of SES risk-adjustors. Hospitals with the most beneficial social case-mix are shown to experience a shift from a positive to a negative financial outcome when SES risk adjustors are included, while the reverse is observed for hospitals with the worst social case-mix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17888552     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

1.  On the effect of prospective payment on local hospital competition in Germany.

Authors:  Helmut Herwartz; Christoph Strumann
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Social inequalities, length of hospital stay for chronic conditions and the mediating role of comorbidity and discharge destination: A multilevel analysis of hospital administrative data linked to the population census in Switzerland.

Authors:  Lucy Bayer-Oglesby; Andrea Zumbrunn; Nicole Bachmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Comparing Hospital Length of Stay Risk-Adjustment Models in US Value-Based Physician Payments.

Authors:  Arnab K Ghosh; Said Ibrahim; Jennifer Lee; Martin F Shapiro; Jessica Ancker
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.147

4.  Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic variations in hospital length of stay: A state-based analysis.

Authors:  Arnab K Ghosh; Benjamin P Geisler; Said Ibrahim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Disparities in outcomes following admission for cholangitis.

Authors:  Julia McNabb-Baltar; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reducing hospital bed use by frail older people: results from a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ian Philp; Karen A Mills; Bhomraj Thanvi; Kris Ghosh; Judith F Long
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Factors Affecting Length of Hospital Stay and Mortality in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers Undergoing Surgical Drainage without Major Amputation.

Authors:  Tae Gyun Kim; Sang Young Moon; Moon Seok Park; Soon-Sun Kwon; Ki Jin Jung; Taeseung Lee; Baek Kyu Kim; Chan Yoon; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Factors affecting length of stay in forensic hospital setting: need for therapeutic security and course of admission.

Authors:  Mary Davoren; Orla Byrne; Paul O'Connell; Helen O'Neill; Ken O'Reilly; Harry G Kennedy
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.630

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.