Literature DB >> 17888435

The concept of damage control: extending the paradigm to emergency general surgery.

S Peter Stawicki1, Adam Brooks, Tracy Bilski, David Scaff, Rajan Gupta, C William Schwab, Vicente H Gracias.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A damage control (DC) approach was developed to improve survival in severely injured trauma patients. The role of DC in acute surgery (AS) patients who are critically ill, as a result of sepsis or overwhelming haemorrhage continues to evolve. The goal of this study was to assess morbidity and mortality of AS patients who underwent DC, and to compare observed and predicted morbidity and mortality as calculated from APACHE II and physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) scores.
METHODS: Consecutive acute surgery patients who underwent DC from 2002 to 2004 were included. Retrospectively collected data included patient demographics, physiological parameters, surgical indications and procedures, mortality, morbidity, as well as volumes of crystalloid and colloid (plasma and red blood cell) resuscitation. Observed mortality and complications were compared to those calculated from APACHE II and POSSUM scores. Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney test for median values, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for proportions.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age 53 years, seven men, nine women) underwent DC. The most common indications for DC included abdominal sepsis (6/15), intraoperative bleeding (5/15), and bowel ischaemia (3/15). The mean intraoperative blood loss during the index procedure was 2060mL. There were 2.4 average procedures per patient. At the end of DC II (36.5h), mean infusion of crystalloid was 17L, packed red blood cells was 3.6L, and plasma was 3L. Eight of 16 patients required vasopressor administration during resuscitation. At 28 days, there were five unexpected survivors as predicted by POSSUM and three by APACHE II (observed mortality seven, predicted mortality by the two methods: 12 (P=0.074), and 10 (P=0.24), respectively). Five patients died prior to definitive abdominal closure. Split thickness skin grafting (4/16) and primary fascial closure (4/16) constituted the most common methods of abdominal closure. Surgical morbidity predicted by POSSUM (98%) and actual morbidity (100%) were similar.
CONCLUSION: Although the morbidity and mortality of AS patients undergoing DC is high, the application of DC principles in this group may reduce mortality compared to that predicted by POSSUM or APACHE II. In order to adequately demonstrate this contention, large, multi-institutional studies of DC in AS patients need to be performed. The POSSUM score appears to accurately estimate the high morbidity in general surgery DC patients, and supports the importance of team management of these complex patients by acute care surgery specialists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17888435     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  27 in total

1.  Packing for damage control of nontraumatic intra-abdominal massive hemorrhages.

Authors:  Filippo Filicori; Salomone Di Saverio; Marco Casali; Andrea Biscardi; Franco Baldoni; Gregorio Tugnoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Damage control strategy for the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: laparoscopic lavage and drainage vs. laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  Song Liang; Karla Russek; Morris E Franklin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Lessons from Trauma Care: Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and Damage Control Laparotomy in the Patient with Gastrointestinal Disease.

Authors:  Aaron Richman; Clay Cothren Burlew
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies.

Authors:  Edouard Girard; Julio Abba; Bastien Boussat; Bertrand Trilling; Adrian Mancini; Pierre Bouzat; Christian Létoublon; Mircea Chirica; Catherine Arvieux
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Cardiac arrest due to massive hemorrhage from uterine adenomyosis with leiomyoma successfully treated with damage control resuscitation.

Authors:  Takeshi Yagi; Motoki Fujita; Tomoaki Inoue; Mari Otsuji; Yasutaka Koga; Takashi Nakahara; Takashi Miyauchi; Kotaro Kaneda; Yasutaka Oda; Ryosuke Tsuruta
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2016-04-18

6.  Geographic Diffusion and Implementation of Acute Care Surgery: An Uneven Solution to the National Emergency General Surgery Crisis.

Authors:  Jasmine A Khubchandani; Angela M Ingraham; Vijaya T Daniel; Didem Ayturk; Catarina I Kiefe; Heena P Santry
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients.

Authors:  Kritaya Kritayakirana; Paul M Maggio; Susan Brundage; Mary-Anne Purtill; Kristan Staudenmayer; David A Spain
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-04

Review 8.  The Evolution of Damage Control in Concept and Practice.

Authors:  Brian C Beldowicz
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

9.  Initial experience of laparostomy with immediate vacuum therapy in patients with severe peritonitis.

Authors:  James Horwood; Fayaz Akbar; Andrew Maw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Abbreviated emergency laparotomy in the non-trauma setting.

Authors:  Benjamin Person; Tatiana Dorfman; Hany Bahouth; Amira Osman; Ahmad Assalia; Yoram Kluger
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.