Literature DB >> 17888192

The influence of epidural volume extension on spinal block with hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine for Caesarean delivery.

S Kucukguclu1, H Unlugenc, F Gunenc, B Kuvaki, N Gokmen, S Gunasti, S Guclu, F Yilmaz, G Isik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Epidural volume extension via a combined spinal-epidural is the enhancement of a small-dose intrathecal block by an epidural injection of physiological saline solution. We evaluated the effect of epidural volume extension on the combined spinal-epidural technique of providing spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section with hyperbaric or plain 0.5% bupivacaine.
METHODS: Patients (n = 240) with height >163 cm received 9 mg and patients <163 cm received 8 mg of bupivacaine. Each study drug was combined with 20 mug fentanyl. Using the combined spinal-epidural technique, Group A (n = 60) received hyperbaric bupivacaine, and Group B (n = 60) received hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 mL saline epidurally 5 min after subarachnoid injection. Group C (n = 60) received plain bupivacaine and Group D (n = 60) received plain bupivacaine and 10 mL saline epidurally 5 min after subarachnoid injection. An anaesthetist blinded to the anaesthetic solution injected examined the level of analgesia by the pinprick method and motor block with the modified Bromage scale for 30 min after subarachnoid injection, during the intraoperative period and subsequently every 15 min for 135 min during the recovery period.
RESULTS: Time to reach a sensory block at T4 was significantly shorter in Groups C and D than in Groups A (P = 0.003 and 0.017) and B (P = 0.006 and 0.048), respectively. During the intraoperative period, sensory block levels were significantly higher in Group C than in Group A. Recovery was similar in all groups; only onset was faster in Groups C and D.
CONCLUSION: There was no effect of epidural volume extension on the profile of spinal anaesthesia with the combined spinal-epidural technique for Caesarean section using hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17888192     DOI: 10.1017/S0265021507002670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Effect of preloading epidural space with normal saline on the incidence of complications of epidural catheter placement and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Guiqi Geng; Xingfeng Sun; Shaoqiang Huang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Retrospective Evaluation of Anaesthetic Techniques for Caesarean.

Authors:  Melek Aksoy Sarı; Semih Küçükgüçlü; Şule Özbilgin; Ferim Sakize Günenç; Sümeyye Mercan; Ayşenur Esen; Büşra Yetim
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-12-01

3.  Reinforcement of subarachnoid block by epidural volume effect in lower abdominal surgery: A comparison between fentanyl and tramadol for efficacy and block properties.

Authors:  Atiharsh Mohan; Preet Mohinder Singh; Deepak Malviya; Sunil Kumar Arya; Dinesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jul-Dec

4.  ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery with and without epidural volume extension with normal saline: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  M Lv; P Zhang; Z Wang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Minimum effective volume of normal saline for epidural volume extension.

Authors:  Asha Tyagi; Surendra Kumar; Rashmi Salhotra; Ashok Kumar Sethi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04

6.  Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Asha Tyagi; Mukundan Ramanujam; Ashok Kumar Sethi; Medha Mohta
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-12-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.